Author
Listed:
- Padmaka Mirihagalla
(Independent Researcher, Rejtő Jenő u. 8, H-1077 Budapest, Hungary)
- Gyula Vastag
(Faculty of Public Governance and International Studies, Ludovika University of Public Service, H-1441 Budapest, Hungary)
Abstract
Background : Lean management has been widely adopted, particularly in logistics operations. Achieving lean is not a discrete intervention but a continuous process of maturing in the integration of processes, work systems, and organizational capabilities within a coherent management philosophy. This maturation requires structured measurement instruments for tracking maturity progression. Although numerous lean maturity models (LMMs) have been proposed, none has achieved methodological standardization or acceptance as a measurement yardstick. Methods : This study addresses this gap by evaluating 27 qualified LMMs using a reproducibility-inspired assessment framework. The paper introduces the OVRGP framework (Opportunity, Validity, Reliability, Generalizability, and Process Integrity), comprising 17 rigor-based criteria. Independent raters with substantial lean expertise evaluated all 27 models using a six-point ordinal scale, achieving a pre-consensus inter-rater reliability of ICC(2,1) = 0.836. Results : Nine critical methodological weaknesses were identified, with average scores below 2.0 for criteria requiring empirical validation, structural integrity testing, and cross-context replication. Conclusions : The study offers targeted methodological guidelines for strengthening future LMM development in logistics and supply chain contexts, and introduces the OVRGP framework as a universal reference architecture for maturity model development across industries. It provides researchers, organizations, and consulting practitioners with a design reference standard for rigorous lean maturity instruments.
Suggested Citation
Padmaka Mirihagalla & Gyula Vastag, 2026.
"Reproducibility Standards for Lean Maturity Models: Design Guidelines for Logistics Operations,"
Logistics, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-25, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:122-:d:1957763
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:6:p:122-:d:1957763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.