IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlogis/v10y2026i4p77-d1912503.html

Bridging Accuracy and Interpretability: A Decision Support System for Stock Deployment and Additive Manufacturing Decisions in Spare Parts Distribution Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Cantini

    (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4B, 20156 Milan, Italy)

  • Antonio Maria Coruzzolo

    (Department of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

  • Francesco Lolli

    (Department of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy)

  • Filippo De Carlo

    (Department of Industrial Engineering (DIEF), University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 40, 50134 Florence, Italy)

  • Alberto Portioli-Staudacher

    (Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4B, 20156 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Background: Spare parts distribution networks (DNs) play a strategic role in retailers’ profitability. Among DN configuration decisions, selecting the optimal stock deployment policy—centralised, decentralised, or hybrid inventory allocation across distribution centres (DCs)—critically affects service levels and logistics costs. This decision becomes more complex with additive manufacturing (AM) as an alternative to conventional manufacturing (CM). While AM enables production with shorter lead times, its higher costs alter stock deployment cost-effectiveness. Given the complexity of joint stock deployment and manufacturing decisions, retailers require decision support systems (DSSs). Methods: To address this need, we develop a DSS through a three-step methodology: (i) a mathematical model evaluates logistics costs across different stock deployment policies and manufacturing technologies; (ii) parametric analysis tests the model across 2000 realistic scenarios; (iii) Random Forest trained on this dataset predicts optimal solutions, with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpreting post hoc recommendations. Results: The DSS achieves 93.4% prediction accuracy—outperforming (+16.4%) the only comparable literature DSS (77%)—while explaining recommendations. SHAP reveals that AM and CM unit costs dominate decision-making, followed by backorder costs. Conclusions: Beyond individual spare parts recommendations, the DSS provides guidelines enabling retailers to maintain cost-effective DNs aligned with evolving customer needs and to plan valuable investments in AM.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Cantini & Antonio Maria Coruzzolo & Francesco Lolli & Filippo De Carlo & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher, 2026. "Bridging Accuracy and Interpretability: A Decision Support System for Stock Deployment and Additive Manufacturing Decisions in Spare Parts Distribution Networks," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:4:p:77-:d:1912503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/10/4/77/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/10/4/77/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:4:p:77-:d:1912503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.