Author
Listed:
- Priscilla Boafowaa Oppong
(Department of Marketing and Supply Chain Management, School of Business, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast 00233, Ghana)
- Anokye M. Adam
(Department of Finance, School of Business, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast 00233, Ghana)
Abstract
Background: Ethical challenges in public procurement are often addressed through compliance approaches that stress rule awareness. These perspectives, however, offer limited insight into how ethical intentions form before professional practice. This study develops and empirically validates the Procurement Literacy Capability Theory (PLCT), which conceptualises procurement literacy as a sequenced, interdependent set of capabilities that produce ethical readiness. Methods: Survey data were collected from 776 undergraduates in procurement-related programmes at four accredited Ghanaian universities. Structural equation modelling tested capability interdependence, sequencing, and behavioural translation. Mediation was examined via bootstrapped indirect effects, with sensitivity analysis using reduced structural models. Results: The findings support PLCT. Digital and E-Procurement Literacy predicts planning and decision-making capability, which then predicts supplier and contract management literacy. This literacy strongly influences Ethical Procurement Practice Literacy, the strongest predictor of Ethical Behavioural Intention. Legal and policy knowledge literacy has no direct effect on ethical intention but acts indirectly through ethical procurement practice capability. Models excluding ethical practice capability have much lower explanatory power. Conclusions: Ethical Behavioural Intention in procurement is shaped by sequenced capability development and applied ethical competence rather than rule awareness alone, confirming ethical practice literacy as the central behavioural mechanism within PLCT.
Suggested Citation
Priscilla Boafowaa Oppong & Anokye M. Adam, 2026.
"Procurement Literacy Capability Theory (PLCT): Development and Validation,"
Logistics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-32, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:60-:d:1882937
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:3:p:60-:d:1882937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.