Author
Listed:
- Sri Rejeki Wahyu Pribadi
(Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)
- Budi Santosa
(Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)
- Budisantoso Wirjodirdjo
(Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)
- Erwin Widodo
(Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology and Systems Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)
- Sjarief Widjaja
(Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)
- Teguh Putranto
(Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Marine Technology, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia)
Abstract
Background : Supplier selection in shipbuilding is a high-stakes decision problem due to stringent quality requirements, compressed construction schedules, and elevated project risks. This study develops a systematic decision-support framework for selecting shipbuilding material suppliers while enhancing supply-chain resilience. Methods : A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework integrating the Best Worst Method (BWM) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is proposed. BWM is used to derive consistent criteria weights with fewer pairwise comparisons, while TOPSIS ranks supplier alternatives based on their distances from ideal and negative-ideal solutions. Results : Quality emerges as the most influential criterion (weight = 0.460), followed by risk-related factors, underscoring the importance of compliance, reliability, and risk mitigation in shipbuilding procurement. The TOPSIS results indicate that Supplier 3 achieves the highest closeness coefficient (Ci = 0.592), followed by Supplier 4, Supplier 2, and Supplier 1, with strong consistency observed in expert judgments. Conclusions : The proposed BWM–TOPSIS framework is rigorous, transparent, and replicable, supporting a Quality–Risk-Oriented multi-sourcing strategy to enhance supply continuity and operational resilience.
Suggested Citation
Sri Rejeki Wahyu Pribadi & Budi Santosa & Budisantoso Wirjodirdjo & Erwin Widodo & Sjarief Widjaja & Teguh Putranto, 2026.
"A Risk-Integrated Supplier Selection Framework for Shipbuilding Materials: A Hybrid BWM–TOPSIS Approach,"
Logistics, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-29, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:45-:d:1862228
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlogis:v:10:y:2026:i:2:p:45-:d:1862228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.