IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v7y2018i3p28-d158209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rights Network: 100 Years of the Hohfeldian Rights Analytic

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Clayton Thompson

    (Lecturer in Law, University of Westminster, London W1W 7UW, UK)

Abstract

This paper sets out to reconsider the Hohfeldian framework of rights in celebration of the centenary anniversary of their original publication. It begins by conceptualizing each of the Hohfeldian incidents or rights before outlining the molecular or complex structure of rights to “things”. I adopt a broad use of the term of “right” and apply it to Legal, Moral, Equitable and Human conceptions and constructions. It sets out an argument in favor of a further definitional model—in addition to Hohfeld’s scheme of opposites and correlatives—which focuses on the function of these conceptual rights. Finally, it sets out to provide a model of rights as forming a network within a given community and the exponential growth of “rights-connections” within an expanding community. This is used to frame responses to common criticisms of “rights talk” and the balance of benefits and burdens on account of such a rights network. Ultimately, this paper seeks to demonstrate the benefit, and indeed necessity, of the Hohfeldian model in any discussion of rights. Without it “rights talk” is debased and impoverished.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Clayton Thompson, 2018. "The Rights Network: 100 Years of the Hohfeldian Rights Analytic," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:28-:d:158209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/3/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/7/3/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:28-:d:158209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.