IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v6y2017i4p22-d116165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Integration of People with Disabilities: Can Olmstead Protect Against Retrenchment?

Author

Listed:
  • Mary Crossley

    (University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA)

Abstract

Since the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, states have made significant progress in enabling Americans with disabilities to live in their communities, rather than institutions. That progress reflects the combined effect of the Supreme Court’s holding in Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring , that states’ failure to provide services to disabled persons in the community may violate the ADA, and amendments to Medicaid that permit states to devote funding to home and community-based services (HCBS). This article considers whether Olmstead and its progeny could act as a check on a potential retrenchment of states’ support for HCBS in the event that states face severe reductions in federal funding for Medicaid, as was threatened by Republican efforts in 2017 to “repeal and replace” the Affordable Care Act and to restructure Medicaid. The article concludes that Olmstead provides a strong basis for challenging a state’s elimination or severe curtailment of existing HCBS programs, but that the fact-specific nature of a state’s likely “fundamental alteration” defense precludes predicting the outcome of such a challenge. Despite this legal uncertainty, protests mounted by people with disabilities, in which they demanded freedom from institutionalization, may have helped cement the idea that community integration is a civil right in the public’s mind.

Suggested Citation

  • Mary Crossley, 2017. "Community Integration of People with Disabilities: Can Olmstead Protect Against Retrenchment?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:22-:d:116165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/22/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/22/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:6:y:2017:i:4:p:22-:d:116165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.