IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v4y2015i2p201-215d50204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physician Charity Care in America: Almost Always an Illusion, Ever More Commercial

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce D. White

    (Alden March Bioethics Institute (AMBI), Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA)

  • Marleen Eijkholt

    (Department of Medical Humanities, Davidson College, Davidson, NC 28035, USA
    Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA)

Abstract

The first Code of Medical Ethics promulgated by the American Medical Association (AMA) in 1847 included a provision that essentially obligated physicians to care for those in their communities who could not afford to pay for professional services. The spirit of that provision remains embodied in today’s Code . However, a “charity care” ethical obligation may not make as much professional sense as it once did. Health care institutions have assumed a much greater role in providing charity care and many physicians are now under legal and quasi-legal obligations to provide care in some cases. Under the recently enacted Affordable Care Act (ACA)—if fully implemented—it is theorized that as many as 95% of Americans will be covered by some basic insurance plan. Perhaps today’s physicians should tailor the charity care mandate into a new jacket, which envisions that all doctors share equally in the care for those without adequate means. An individual obligation may have to make way for a more communal one in professional codes. Moreover, it may be wise to consider if there are any lessons to draw from other health care systems (e.g., the Dutch), where questions about charity care still exist within a universal health care system context.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce D. White & Marleen Eijkholt, 2015. "Physician Charity Care in America: Almost Always an Illusion, Ever More Commercial," Laws, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:201-215:d:50204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/2/201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/2/201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:201-215:d:50204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.