IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v4y2015i1p37-59d45081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supported Decision-Making for People with Cognitive Impairments: An Australian Perspective?

Author

Listed:
  • Terry Carney

    (Faculty of Law, The University of Sydney, Eastern Avenue, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
    Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

Abstract

Honouring the requirement of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to introduce supported decision-making poses many challenges. Not least of those challenges is in writing laws and devising policies which facilitate access to formal and informal supports for large numbers of citizens requiring assistance with day-to-day issues such as dealing with welfare agencies, managing income security payments, or making health care decisions. Old measures such as representative payee schemes or “nominee” arrangements are not compatible with the CRPD. However, as comparatively routine social security or other government services become increasingly complex to navigate, and as self-managed or personalised budgets better recognise self-agency, any “off the shelf” measures become more difficult to craft and difficult to resource. This paper focuses on recent endeavours of the Australian Law Reform Commission and other local and overseas law reform and policy initiatives to tackle challenges posed both for ordinary citizens and those covered by special programs (such as Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme and “disability trusts” in Australia and Canada).

Suggested Citation

  • Terry Carney, 2015. "Supported Decision-Making for People with Cognitive Impairments: An Australian Perspective?," Laws, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:37-59:d:45081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/1/37/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/4/1/37/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernadette McSherry, 2015. "Decision-Making, Legal Capacity and Neuroscience: Implications for Mental Health Laws," Laws, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Emily Cukalevski, 2019. "Supporting Choice and Control—An Analysis of the Approach Taken to Legal Capacity in Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Kathy Boschen & Caroline Phelan & Sharon Lawn, 2022. "NDIS Participants with Psychosocial Disabilities and Life-Limiting Diagnoses: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:4:y:2015:i:1:p:37-59:d:45081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.