IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v15y2026i4p77-d1997679.html

Dian in the Civil Code Era: A Historical, Systematic, and Axiological Reassessment

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Xiao

    (Law School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

Abstract

As an inherent part of Chinese indigenous legal tradition, dian originated from customary practices and was gradually incorporated into the national legal framework, reflecting a distinctive historical evolution, structural composition, and value orientation. Historically, dian evolved from a simple customary transaction into a formalized legal institution. It first took shape during the Tang Dynasty and matured through the Ming and Qing Dynasties. Structurally, long-term practice produced unique concepts and rules that embodied the dual nature of both usufructuary and security rights. In terms of value, dian was not merely an economic transaction tool but also reflected ethical norms and pragmatic wisdom of traditional society. It played a vital role in protecting the interests of the mortgagor, promoting circulation of land, and alleviating financial shortages. In the Civil Code era, the value of dian lies particularly in its ability to reconcile individual interests with social needs and to enhance the efficiency of property utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Xiao, 2026. "Dian in the Civil Code Era: A Historical, Systematic, and Axiological Reassessment," Laws, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:15:y:2026:i:4:p:77-:d:1997679
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/15/4/77/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/15/4/77/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:15:y:2026:i:4:p:77-:d:1997679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.