IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v14y2025i5p73-d1765735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Nobody Really Got Hurt”—The Legitimization of the Grey Area of Sexual Violence and the Reflection of Gender Roles

Author

Listed:
  • Aixa Louro de Almeida

    (School of Psychology, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Sofia Knittel

    (School of Psychology, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
    William James Center for Research, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Bárbara Pereira

    (School of Psychology, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
    William James Center for Research, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Emma de Thouars da Silva

    (School of Psychology, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
    William James Center for Research, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Andreia de Castro Rodrigues

    (School of Psychology, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
    William James Center for Research, ISPA—Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal)

Abstract

There is little research exploring the grey area of sexual violence (SV), considered in the literature as being a more subtle manifestation of SV, and therefore tending to be trivialized, legitimized, and normalized by society. This study aimed to compare students’ perceptions of the grey area of SV based on the gender of those involved, in a cis-hetero context, as well as potential sex differences in these perceptions. A vignette methodology was employed to gain valuable insights into the topic. The sample consisted of 164 university students living in Portugal, 71.3% ( n = 117) female, with an average age of 23 (SD = 5.84). The thematic analysis revealed a central theme, Severity, reflecting participants’ perceptions of the seriousness of sexual violence within the “grey area”. This theme is expressed through four sub-themes: Attribution of severity, referring to how seriousness is assigned depending on context and beliefs; Identifying sexual violence, highlighting difficulties in recognizing certain behaviors as abusive; Frequency, capturing perceptions of how often such situations occur; and Report, addressing the barriers and facilitators to formal reporting. Our results indicated that while some participants minimized the scenario, the majority of the sample considered the situation as somewhat or very serious. Only few participants trivialized subtle forms of SV, perceiving incidents without overt physical force as less severe. Notably, sex differences emerged, despite being in the minority of the sample, female participants were more inclined to recognize these behaviors as abusive and to view the allegations as credible, whereas male participants tended to downplay the severity.

Suggested Citation

  • Aixa Louro de Almeida & Sofia Knittel & Bárbara Pereira & Emma de Thouars da Silva & Andreia de Castro Rodrigues, 2025. "“Nobody Really Got Hurt”—The Legitimization of the Grey Area of Sexual Violence and the Reflection of Gender Roles," Laws, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:73-:d:1765735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/5/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/5/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:73-:d:1765735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.