IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v14y2025i5p68-d1753266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing the Societal Value of Tort Law by Meeting Justice Needs of All Stakeholders: Towards Restorative Tort Law

Author

Listed:
  • Femke M. Ruitenbeek-Bart

    (Faculty of Law, Department of Private Law Amsterdam Centre of Responsive Law, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Arno J. Akkermans

    (Faculty of Law, Department of Private Law Amsterdam Centre of Responsive Law, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

With their traditional focus on financial compensation, tort law systems worldwide struggle with the adverse effects the claims resolution process can have on victims of personal injury. It has therefore been argued that tort law systems should be more emotionally intelligent and more mindful of the non-financial needs of victims. In this debate, the perspective of the wrongdoer has been largely neglected. Drawing from empirical research on the personal experiences of wrongdoers in the Dutch personal injury practice and building on theories of procedural and restorative justice, this contribution argues that, to optimize the societal value of tort law systems, attention should be paid to the wrongdoer’s perspective. A tort law system that lacks sufficient opportunity for wrongdoers to personally make amends is deficient both in terms of morality and justice, as it deprives both victims and wrongdoers of a chance at emotional and moral recovery from the injurious event. We therefore believe this represents a shared future for all of us, towards restorative tort law.

Suggested Citation

  • Femke M. Ruitenbeek-Bart & Arno J. Akkermans, 2025. "Optimizing the Societal Value of Tort Law by Meeting Justice Needs of All Stakeholders: Towards Restorative Tort Law," Laws, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:68-:d:1753266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/5/68/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/5/68/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:68-:d:1753266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.