IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v14y2025i4p45-d1690631.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Justice Delayed in the COVID-19 Era: Injunctions, Mootness, and Religious Freedom in the United States Legal System

Author

Listed:
  • Karen McGuffee

    (Department of Social, Cultural, & Justice Studies, University of Tennessee Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN 37402, USA)

  • Tammy Garland

    (Department of Social, Cultural, & Justice Studies, University of Tennessee Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN 37402, USA)

  • Sherah L. Basham

    (Department of Social, Cultural, & Justice Studies, University of Tennessee Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN 37402, USA)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical deficiencies in the United States’ legal system’s handling of emergency injunctions, particularly concerning religious freedom. This article examines the challenges courts faced in balancing public health measures with constitutional rights, focusing on the use of shadow dockets and the frequent dismissal of cases due to mootness. Analyzing key Supreme Court decisions and lower court rulings, we highlight the inconsistencies and delays that arose when addressing First Amendment challenges to pandemic-related restrictions. Arguments for procedural reforms, including expedited hearings and avoiding mootness dismissals in cases of national importance, are provided to protect fundamental rights during future public health crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen McGuffee & Tammy Garland & Sherah L. Basham, 2025. "Justice Delayed in the COVID-19 Era: Injunctions, Mootness, and Religious Freedom in the United States Legal System," Laws, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:45-:d:1690631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/4/45/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/14/4/45/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:14:y:2025:i:4:p:45-:d:1690631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.