IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlawss/v10y2021i2p30-d539554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Special Solicitude: Religious Freedom at America’s Public Universities

Author

Listed:
  • William E. Thro

    (Office of Legal Counsel, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA)

Abstract

Rejecting the Obama Administration’s argument that the First Amendment requires identical treatment for religious organizations and secular organizations, the Supreme Court held such a “result is hard to square with the text of the First Amendment itself, which gives special solicitude to the rights of religious organizations.” ( Hosanna-Tabor , 565 U.S. at 189). This “special solicitude” guarantees religious freedom from the government in all aspects of society, but particularly on public university campuses. At a minimum, religious expression and religious organizations must have equal rights with secular expression and secular organizations. In some instances, religious expression and religious expression may have greater rights. The Court’s 2020 decisions in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue , and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru , reinforce and expand the “special solicitude” of religion. Indeed, Espinoza and Our Lady have profound implications for student religious groups at America’s public campuses. This article examines religious freedom at America’s public universities. This article has three parts. First, it offers an overview of religious freedom prior to Espinoza and Our Lady . Second, it briefly discusses those two cases. Third, it explores the implications of those decisions on America’s public campuses.

Suggested Citation

  • William E. Thro, 2021. "Special Solicitude: Religious Freedom at America’s Public Universities," Laws, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-9, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:30-:d:539554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/2/30/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/10/2/30/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlawss:v:10:y:2021:i:2:p:30-:d:539554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.