IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i6p964-d1957461.html

Can Pocket Parks Bridge Green Space Inequalities in High-Density Cities? A System-Level and Gradient-Based Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mengling Yan

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Hefang Geng

    (Shanghai Municipal Landscape Management and Guidance Station, Shanghai 200020, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yanting Zhang

    (Shanghai Municipal Landscape Management and Guidance Station, Shanghai 200020, China)

  • Benyao Wang

    (Shanghai Municipal Landscape Management and Guidance Station, Shanghai 200020, China)

  • Yuheng Cao

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Shengquan Che

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Changkun Xie

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Yifeng Qin

    (School of Design, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Alessio Russo

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

Abstract

Cities worldwide face persistent inequalities in access to urban green spaces, a condition associated with reduced physical activity and poorer mental wellbeing. In high-density metropolises, land scarcity further intensifies these disparities. Although recent studies have highlighted the potential of small-scale green spaces, limited attention has been paid to their system-level and spatially differentiated roles within urban green infrastructure. Consequently, the equality implications of micro-scale interventions such as pocket parks across urban–rural gradients remain insufficiently understood. This study addresses this gap by examining the accessibility impacts of 475 pocket parks in conjunction with 433 large parks in Shanghai, using a multidimensional, citywide analytical framework. The Gaussian two-step floating catchment area (G2SFCA) method was applied within the 15-min community life circle framework to assess service coverage, population served, and per capita accessible green space, as well as their urban–rural differentiation patterns. Results indicate that the inclusion of pocket parks modestly increases overall service coverage (+3.41%) but substantially improves population access (+7.83%), converting 143.79 km 2 of previously unserved areas into areas with basic green space provision. Spatial effects vary along the urban–rural gradient: pocket parks generate high marginal population-service benefits and improve spatial equality in urban cores, strengthen green space service networks in peri-urban areas, and produce incremental accessibility gains in outer suburbs. Taken together, these findings provide a novel system-level understanding of how pocket parks function within urban green infrastructure networks, offering policy-relevant evidence to guide equality-oriented planning in high-density cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengling Yan & Hefang Geng & Yanting Zhang & Benyao Wang & Yuheng Cao & Shengquan Che & Changkun Xie & Yifeng Qin & Alessio Russo, 2026. "Can Pocket Parks Bridge Green Space Inequalities in High-Density Cities? A System-Level and Gradient-Based Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:6:p:964-:d:1957461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/6/964/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/6/964/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:6:p:964-:d:1957461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.