IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i6p1069-d1969320.html

Effects of Policy Mixes for Conservation Tillage on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Mei Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

  • Yun Deng

    (College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)

Abstract

Conservation tillage plays an important role in improving sustainable land use and maintaining food production. Using survey data from 261 agricultural producers in Heilongjiang Province, China, this study examines how conservation tillage policy mixes affect agricultural green total factor productivity (AGTFP). The slack-based measure (SBM) model incorporating undesirable outputs is employed to estimate AGTFP. A Tobit model with interaction terms is applied to analyze the independent and combined effects of three policy instruments: subsidies, regulations, and supporting services, and a mediating effect model is used to verify how these instruments work. The results indicate that: (1) the mean AGTFP value stands at 0.37, reflecting a generally low level of performance, with the largest improvement requirements observed in seed inputs (66.25%), machinery inputs (65.53%), and nitrogen emissions (61.55%); (2) subsidies, regulations, and supporting services all improve AGTFP, while the combinations of subsidies and services, regulations and services, and the full three-policy mix generate significant positive synergistic effects; (3) policy mixes facilitate AGTFP enhancement by increasing agricultural producers’ perceived value of conservation tillage technologies and reducing perceived risks. In particular, the interaction between regulations and supporting services significantly increased perceived value (β = 1.129, p < 0.01) and reduced perceived risk (β = −0.810, p < 0.01); (4) the effects of policy mixes are stronger for producers pursuing green production goals and for small-scale farmers. Based on these findings, the following recommendations are proposed: policy efforts should strengthen the coordination of subsidies, regulations, and services, linking training and inspection results to subsidy eligibility; address efficiency bottlenecks in seeds, machinery, labor, and nitrogen emissions; design differentiated policy packages for various farm types; and build a training system that includes at least two mandatory sessions per season and ties training outcomes to subsequent subsidies. This study contributes a policy mix perspective to the evaluation of AGTFP and provides empirical evidence for coordinated conservation tillage policy design.

Suggested Citation

  • Mei Zhang & Yun Deng, 2026. "Effects of Policy Mixes for Conservation Tillage on Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Heilongjiang Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:6:p:1069-:d:1969320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/6/1069/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/6/1069/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:6:p:1069-:d:1969320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.