IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i6p1002-d1961506.html

Beyond the Three Ambiguities: A Capability Approach to Divorced Women’s Collective Membership for Land Expropriation Compensation in Rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Linghui Liu

    (School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
    Hangzhou International Urbanology Research Center/Zhejiang Urban Governance Studies Center, Hangzhou 311121, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Keyi Gou

    (School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Linyuan Ran

    (School of Public Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Under the dual impact of new urbanization and rural population mobility, divorced rural women in China face severe challenges in obtaining collective membership qualification for land expropriation compensation. The newly enacted Rural Collective Economic Organization Law (RCEOL) contains ambiguous provisions, hindering effective implementation. This study asks: How can collective membership qualification for divorced rural women be determined based on pre-enactment court judgments to refine the law’s ambiguities? Adopting a qualitative design, data were collected from China Judgments Online. Through systematic keyword search, 238 court judgments were retrieved and analyzed using a three-level coding procedure (open, axial, selective). The theoretical framework draws on Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Three main findings are briefly summarized. First, a concrete determination scheme is proposed: the “stable rights-obligations relationship” is operationalized via collective medical insurance purchase and non-abandonment of contracted land; “basic livelihood security” emphasizes land’s security function without requiring primary income reliance; the “stable production-living relationship” criterion should be discarded. Second, the household registration (hukou) condition is becoming ambiguous, but such ambiguity reflects governance adaptation to complexity, moving toward “de-hukouization.” Third, legal ambiguity, while challenging, creates a flexible space for adaptive rural governance. This study contributes by introducing Sen’s capability approach into the analysis of divorced rural women’s membership qualification and providing empirical grounds for clarifying Article 11 of the RCEOL. Future research may observe changes in case volume and litigant testimonies after the law’s implementation to evaluate its real effects, further enriching the discussion on institution—agency interaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Linghui Liu & Keyi Gou & Linyuan Ran, 2026. "Beyond the Three Ambiguities: A Capability Approach to Divorced Women’s Collective Membership for Land Expropriation Compensation in Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:6:p:1002-:d:1961506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/6/1002/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/6/1002/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:6:p:1002-:d:1961506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.