Author
Listed:
- Zhao Zhang
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)
- Zhibin Tao
(Department of Accountancy and Finance, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)
- Hui Peng
(School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China)
Abstract
With the increasing constraints of resource and environmental factors and the prominent issues of regional development imbalance, how to scientifically measure the level of agricultural sustainable development and reveal its spatial-temporal differentiation patterns has become a key scientific question that urgently needs to be addressed in optimizing land use layout and promoting rural revitalization. This study takes the human-land spatial systems coupling theory as the core framework and constructs an evaluation index system for agricultural sustainable development covering five dimensions: economy, society, resources, ecology, and technology. Based on provincial panel data in China from 2001 to 2024, the entropy method is employed to measure agricultural sustainable development, while Dagum’s Gini coefficient, kernel density estimation, and convergence models are applied to analyze its spatial–temporal evolution. Furthermore, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method is introduced to identify multi-factor configurational driving pathways. The results indicate that the overall level of agricultural sustainable development in China shows a steady upward trend, exhibiting a regional gradient pattern characterized by “central region leading, eastern region steadily advancing, and western region gradually catching up”. The overall disparity presents a weak convergence trend, with inter-regional differences as the primary source, although their contribution is gradually declining. The development structure has evolved from regional fragmentation to a more complex spatial interaction pattern. The overall distribution shifts rightward with evident stage-based differentiation, accompanied by significant positive spatial dependence, with “high–high” and “low–low” clustering coexisting over the long term. Convergence analysis shows that σ-convergence exists at the national level. After accounting for spatial effects, significant absolute β-convergence is observed in the eastern and western regions, while the central region does not exhibit significant convergence. Conditional β-convergence further confirms the existence of regional convergence trends, although the convergence speeds vary. The fsQCA results indicate that agricultural sustainable development is not driven by a single factor but by multiple configurational pathways formed through the interaction of various conditions. These findings provide empirical evidence for optimizing agricultural spatial layout, strengthening land factor support, and promoting regionally coordinated agricultural sustainable development.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:4:p:567-:d:1909693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.