Author
Listed:
- Normunds Stivrins
(Department of Geology, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia
Faculty of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia
Department of Geology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
Lake and Peatland Research Centre, LV-4063 Aloja, Latvia)
- Ilze Ozola
(Lake and Peatland Research Centre, LV-4063 Aloja, Latvia)
- Maikls Andriksons
(Department of Geology, University of Latvia, LV-1004 Riga, Latvia)
- Jovita Pilecka-Ulcugaceva
(Faculty of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)
- Inga Grinfelde
(Faculty of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia
Lietuvos Inžinerijos Kolegija Higher Education Institution, LT-50155 Kaunas, Lithuania)
Abstract
Peatlands cover approximately 10% (640,000 ha) of Latvia’s territory, of which about 51,000 ha is officially classified as degraded due to peat extraction and related activities. This study assesses the current status of peat extraction site recultivation in Latvia and evaluates future after-use requirements under contrasting policy pathways using a review of scientific literature, project reports, national statistics, and updated peat extraction licence records. A simple allocation model was applied to estimate recultivation trajectories for the nationally defined degraded peatland area under two scenarios: (i) a licence-expiry baseline scenario and (ii) an accelerated immediate-stop-peat-mining scenario. The results show that full recultivation would require average annual efforts of approximately 1500 ha yr −1 under the baseline scenario and around 2000 ha yr −1 under the accelerated scenario. Although European Union-funded projects and corporate initiatives have demonstrated the potential of rewetting, paludiculture, and renewable energy integration, only a limited number of sites have been officially recognised as fully recultivated or restored. Because ecological recovery of peatland functions may take decades, administrative closure alone does not guarantee climate or biodiversity benefits. A phased recultivation strategy linked to licence expiry and prioritising degraded and self-regenerating sites emerges as the most pragmatic pathway for Latvia, balancing European Union climate objectives, institutional capacity, and socio-economic constraints.
Suggested Citation
Normunds Stivrins & Ilze Ozola & Maikls Andriksons & Jovita Pilecka-Ulcugaceva & Inga Grinfelde, 2026.
"After-Use Trajectories of Peatlands Under Alternative Policy Pathways in Latvia,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:4:p:558-:d:1908188
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:4:p:558-:d:1908188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.