Author
Listed:
- Saurabh Singh
(Department of Civil Engineering, Poornima University, Sitapura 303905, Rajasthan, India
Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido 060-0808, Japan)
- Sudip Pandey
(Graduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan)
- Ankush Kumar Jain
(Department of Civil Engineering, Poornima University, Sitapura 303905, Rajasthan, India)
- Ashraf Mousa
(Geodynamic Department, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Helwan 11421, Egypt)
- Fahdah Falah Ben Hasher
(Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)
- Mohamed Zhran
(Public Works Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)
Abstract
Rapid urbanization, environmental degradation and climate variability are intensifying the exposure of urban populations to multiple, interacting hazards in megacities. In India’s capital, Delhi, extreme heat, worsening air quality and flood-related stress overlap in impacted areas, exacerbated by high population density in low-lying zones and extensive built-up cover. This study develops an integrated spatial framework for assessing relative multi-hazard risk potential in Delhi by combining remote sensing, climate reanalysis, land use and demographic datasets into a predictive modeling system to support urban resilience planning. A comprehensive suite of twenty-two predictors representing thermal stress, air quality, surface indices, topography, hydrology, land use land cover (LULC), and demographic data was derived from diverse Earth observation sources. A cloud-native workflow leveraging Google Earth Engine (GEE) and Python 3 harmonized these predictors to train a Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model with five-fold spatial cross-validation. Quantile regression was used to estimate lower (P10) and upper (P90) predictive bounds, which are interpreted here as empirical predictive intervals around the modeled risk surface rather than as a strict separation of different uncertainty types, while SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) decomposed the non-linear contributions of individual features. The model achieved predictive accuracy (R 2 = 0.98, MAE = 0.01), with residuals centered near zero and consistent performance across spatial folds, demonstrating strong generalizability. Road density (63.4%) and population density (25.9%) emerged as the primary predictors of the modeled risk surface, followed by building density and NO 2 concentration. Conversely, vegetation cover (NDVI) functioned as a critical mitigating buffer. Spatial risk maps identified persistent high-risk clusters in eastern and northeastern Delhi, coinciding with dense transport networks and industrial zones. The integrated P90 mapping framework provides spatially explicit and uncertainty-aware information on relative multi-hazard risk potential to guide targeted interventions, such as transport corridor mitigation and urban greening in Delhi and other rapidly urbanizing cities.
Suggested Citation
Saurabh Singh & Sudip Pandey & Ankush Kumar Jain & Ashraf Mousa & Fahdah Falah Ben Hasher & Mohamed Zhran, 2026.
"Integrated Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment for Delhi with Quantile-Regressed LightGBM and SHAP Interpretation,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:488-:d:1897785
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:488-:d:1897785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.