Author
Listed:
- Jiao Yang
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Benchmarking and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)
- Huan Ma
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Benchmarking and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)
- Qiang Yu
(College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Ting Song
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Benchmarking and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)
- Wei Ji
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Benchmarking and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)
- Chaoyang Feng
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Benchmarking and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Regional Eco-Process and Function Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)
Abstract
Carbon storage of terrestrial ecosystems is highly susceptible to land use/cover change (LUCC). In order to optimize land use patterns and advance the dual carbon goals (carbon peaking and carbon neutrality), it is imperative to clarify the role of LUCC in controlling regional terrestrial carbon storage. This study utilized a land use dataset spanning from 1990 to 2020 and incorporated 12 pivotal driving factors. Based on these data and factors, this study constructs four distinct future development scenarios: natural development scenario (ND), cropland protection scenario (CP), ecological protection scenario (EP), and urban development scenario (UD). By integrating the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model (InVEST) with the Patch-Generating Land Use Simulation model (PLUS), this study simulated the dynamic changes in land use types and the spatiotemporal evolution of carbon storage in the Qinba Mountains (QBMs). The results revealed that between 1990 and 2020, built-up area and water area experienced substantial expansion with growth rates of 67.89% and 20.39%, respectively. In addition, cropland decreased by 3.09% and grassland decreased by 2.49%. Notably, cropland exhibited the most pronounced conversion intensity among all land use types during this period. Correspondingly, the total terrestrial carbon storage in the study area declined slightly from 7471.08 × 10 6 t in 1990 to 7437.25 × 10 6 t in 2020. Forestland dominated the regional carbon pool, accounting for an average of 47.67% of the total carbon storage over the three decades. Further analysis identified natural factors as the primary drivers of LUCC and associated carbon storage changes, with DEM exerting the greatest influence, followed by mean annual temperature and mean annual precipitation. Projection analyses for 2030 reveal divergent carbon storage outcomes across different land use scenarios relative to the 2020 baseline. Under the natural development (ND) and urban development (UD) scenarios, total carbon stocks are projected to decline by 37.63 × 10 6 t and 19.99 × 10 6 t, respectively. Conversely, implementation of conservation-oriented strategies yields substantial increases, with the cropland protection (CP) and ecological protection (EP) scenarios enhancing carbon storage by 16.87 × 10 6 t and 13.07 × 10 6 t, respectively. These findings underscore the critical role of protection-focused land use policies in strengthening ecosystem carbon sequestration capacity. The study provides a scientific foundation for formulating targeted forestry management policies and enhancing the terrestrial ecosystems’ capacity to act as carbon sinks in mountainous areas.
Suggested Citation
Jiao Yang & Huan Ma & Qiang Yu & Ting Song & Wei Ji & Chaoyang Feng, 2026.
"Analysis of Land Use and Carbon Storage Dynamics Change in the Qinling-Daba Mountains,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:487-:d:1897627
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:487-:d:1897627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.