IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i3p470-d1893573.html

Can Ecological Civilization Construction Enhance Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from China’s Prefecture-Level Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Yuchen Hua

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Jiameng Yang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Mengyuan Qiu

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Xiuzhi Yang

    (School of Marxism, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Reconciling economic growth with environmental protection continues to represent a central global challenge. As one of the world’s largest developing economies, China has advanced an ecological civilization strategy that offers a unique opportunity to evaluate how national policy can shape sustainable development trajectories. This study assesses whether China’s ecological civilization construction enhances urban green total factor productivity (GTFP). Using panel data for 283 Chinese cities (2006–2019), this study identifies ecological civilization pilot cities through a standardized and reproducible protocol, measures urban GTFP using the Global Malmquist–Luenberger (GML) index and estimates policy effects with a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) design that accounts for staggered implementation and overlapping policies. The results indicate that urban GTFP exhibited an overall upward but fluctuating trend during the study period, with regional growth rates ranking East > Central > West and a tendency toward convergence in recent years. The analysis further indicates that national ecological civilization construction policies exert a statistically significant and positive effect on urban GTFP, with the findings remaining robust to parallel trend tests and multiple robustness checks. The promotion effect displays marked regional heterogeneity, being strongest in western cities, followed by eastern and central regions, and remains positive across different urban contexts, including resource-based and non-resource-based cities as well as cities within and outside the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Mechanism analysis further reveals that the policy effect operates primarily through industrial upgrading and green technological innovation, whereas the industrial structure rationalization channel is not statistically significant. Overall, this study provides a transparent and reproducible framework for pilot city identification and causal evaluation, offering policy-relevant insights for differentiated and region-specific ecological governance aimed at balanced regional development, industrial upgrading, and green technological innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuchen Hua & Jiameng Yang & Mengyuan Qiu & Xiuzhi Yang, 2026. "Can Ecological Civilization Construction Enhance Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from China’s Prefecture-Level Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-34, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:470-:d:1893573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/3/470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/3/470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:470-:d:1893573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.