IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i3p463-d1892797.html

The City as a Commons Approach and New Forms of Collaborative Governance Models: The Example of Bologna

Author

Listed:
  • Cecilia Mazzoli

    (Department of Architecture (DA), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Isabella Giovanetti

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Konstantina Douka

    (Department of Architecture (DA), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Annarita Ferrante

    (Department of Architecture (DA), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Claudio Lantieri

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental, and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Annemie Wyckmans

    (Department of Architecture and Planning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Dirk Ahlers

    (Department of Architecture and Planning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

This paper examines Bologna as an emblematic case to explore how the City as a Commons approach can support the implementation of the Climate City Contracts (CCCs) and advance a climate-neutral urban transition through collaborative governance and participatory urban regeneration. Bologna has a long-standing participation ecosystem resulting in the signing of over 800 collaborative pacts activated since 2014, and, from that time, the activation of the participation process of the citizens with the Municipality, defined as the “City as a Commons”, in collaboration with the University. These initiatives have been recently consolidated and integrated with the city’s CCC for the EU Cities Mission and its NetZeroCities platform in 2023, expanding citizens’ roles, engagement platforms, and enabling resources aligned with the 2030 climate-neutrality goal. Methodologically, the study combines a qualitative analysis of Bologna’s governance trajectory with an indicator-based reading of 17 participatory projects inspired by New European Bauhaus (NEB) collected within the three-year CrAFt (Creating Actionable Futures) project funded under the Horizon Europe Programme. As an interpretive and comparative tool, the CrAFt NEB Impact Model (NEB IM) is applied to identify patterns and gaps across governance, social, environmental, and economic dimensions, rather than to rank projects. Findings indicate that the governance and social participation dimensions are more developed than the environmental and economic implementation dimensions, highlighting both the potential and the limitations of commoning approaches in supporting CCC implementation and delivering balanced climate-neutral urban transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cecilia Mazzoli & Isabella Giovanetti & Konstantina Douka & Annarita Ferrante & Claudio Lantieri & Annemie Wyckmans & Dirk Ahlers, 2026. "The City as a Commons Approach and New Forms of Collaborative Governance Models: The Example of Bologna," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:463-:d:1892797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/3/463/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/3/463/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:463-:d:1892797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.