Author
Listed:
- Xiaohui Yang
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Dongmin Liu
(School of Arts and Media, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
- Mengmeng Hao
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Dong Jiang
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- He Zhu
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Abstract
China’s Cultural Ecological Protection Zones (CEPZs) are a distinctive policy instrument intended to safeguard intangible cultural heritage through the “integrated” protection of cultural practices and their supporting socioecological environments. However, there remains limited robust causal evidence on whether CEPZs generate measurable ecological co-benefits and whether such benefits come with landscape-structure trade-offs. Using a county-level panel covering 454 counties from 2006 to 2023, we evaluate CEPZs’ impacts on ecosystem quality and landscape patterns through a multi-period DID design with a rich set of socio-environmental controls. Ecosystem quality is proxied by a satellite-derived NDVI, NDWI, and NPP, while landscape pattern outcomes are captured by a composite landscape pattern connectivity index (LPCI) derived from multi-metric landscape configuration indicators. We further test mechanisms using mediators constructed from Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis (MSPA) (core habitat proportion) and built-up land proportion, and examine heterogeneity by local governance capacity and region. The results show that CEPZ designation significantly increases the NDVI (β = 0.002, p < 0.01) but significantly reduces the LPCI (β = −0.004, p < 0.01). The average effects on the NDWI and NPP are statistically insignificant. Mechanism tests reveal two countervailing pathways: CEPZs increase the share of core habitat (β = 0.009, p < 0.01), which is positively associated with the NDVI, while simultaneously expanding built-up land (β = 0.012, p < 0.01), which offsets greening and drives fragmentation. Heterogeneity analyses suggest that ecological gains are amplified where independent CEPZ management agencies exist and are stronger in western/central China. These findings provide causal evidence that biocultural governance can yield “greening” co-benefits but may undermine landscape integrity unless development pressures are spatially regulated and local institutional capacity is strengthened.
Suggested Citation
Xiaohui Yang & Dongmin Liu & Mengmeng Hao & Dong Jiang & He Zhu, 2026.
"Do Cultural Ecological Policies Deliver Ecological Co-Benefits? A Quasi-Natural Experiment for CEPZs in China,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:461-:d:1892632
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:461-:d:1892632. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.