Author
Listed:
- Ziyi Cai
(School of Politics and Public Administration, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)
- Junjie Mu
(Department of Civil Engineering, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu 611730, China)
- Bozhou Pan
(Department of Civil Engineering, Chengdu Technological University, Chengdu 611730, China)
- Zhiqi Yang
(School of Politics and Public Administration, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)
Abstract
Against the backdrop of China’s dual carbon goals, understanding how terrain complexity affects the decoupling linkage between infrastructure investment and carbon emissions is crucial for developing differentiated low-carbon strategies. This study focuses on Sichuan Province, a region characterized by significant topographical heterogeneity, to investigate how terrain constraints influence carbon emission decoupling. We construct a Terrain Constraint Index (TCI) using three indicators (Digital Elevation Model (DEM), Coefficient of Variation of elevation (CV), and Terrain Position Index (TPI)) weighted by a game theory-based combination of entropy and Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) methods and employ the Tapio decoupling model combined with group comparison analysis to examine the correlation between terrain complexity and decoupling performance. The key findings are as follows. (1) The TCI exhibits a “high in the west, low in the east” spatial pattern, ranging from 0.151 (Zigong) to 0.591 (Ya’an), with five distinct terrain complexity levels identified. (2) During 2001–2021, good decoupling states (strong + weak decoupling) accounted for 76.8% of all observations, indicating overall improvement in carbon emission efficiency. (3) A monotonic negative association is observed between terrain complexity and decoupling performance: the good decoupling ratio decreases from 82.5% in Low TCI regions to 62.5% in Very High TCI regions, with Mann–Whitney tests showing suggestive differences (raw p < 0.05, though not significant after Bonferroni correction). (4) Average decoupling elasticity increases from 0.182 in Very Low TCI regions to 0.705 in Very High TCI regions, demonstrating that higher terrain complexity is associated with worse decoupling outcomes. (5) Geodetector analysis reveals that infrastructure investment has the highest explanatory power (q = 0.401, p < 0.01), and the interaction between terrain factors and investment shows significant nonlinear enhancement effects (q = 0.544–0.830). These findings suggest that terrain complexity is associated with worse carbon emission decoupling, plausibly through affecting infrastructure investment efficiency, and point to the need for differentiated low-carbon strategies for regions with varying topographical conditions.
Suggested Citation
Ziyi Cai & Junjie Mu & Bozhou Pan & Zhiqi Yang, 2026.
"Terrain Complexity and Infrastructure–Carbon Decoupling: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:397-:d:1874909
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:397-:d:1874909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.