IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i3p372-d1872219.html

Landscape Pattern Evolution–Informed Ecosystem Health Assessment and Restoration Strategies in the Luxi River Basin (Chengdu, China) Based on the PSR Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Chen

    (College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Guochao Li

    (College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Yixin Hao

    (College of Architecture and Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

Assessing ecosystem health in rapidly urbanizing watersheds requires policy-relevant and empirically grounded indicator systems. Focusing on the Luxi River Basin in Chengdu’s Tianfu New Area, this study develops an ecosystem health evaluation and restoration zoning scheme based on the Pressure–State–Response framework (PSR). Utilizing remote sensing land use maps for 2004, 2014, and 2024 with overall accuracy and Kappa above 85% and 0.80, respectively, a 13-indicator PSR health index with entropy-based weighting was constructed at the township and subdistrict scales. Aiming to support objective indicator selection and interpretation, multiscale landscape dynamics were further quantified using FRAGSTATS and moving window analysis, including mean patch area, patch density, landscape shape index, largest patch index, Shannon diversity index, Shannon evenness index, contagion index, and splitting index, and sensitive landscape descriptors and major driving factors were identified. Results show a shift in landscape patterns, from relatively aggregated configurations toward highly complex and fragmented ones. Largest patch dominance, measured by the largest patch index, declined from 66.71 to 22.79, while connectivity, measured by the contagion index, decreased from 59.74 to 45.10. Subdivision, measured by the splitting index, increased from 2.24 to 12.88, and compositional heterogeneity, measured by the Shannon diversity index, increased from 0.86 to 1.26. The PSR assessment indicates that demographic pressure intensified over time, whereas improvements in water resource supply, technological progress, and industrial upgrading partially alleviated overall pressure in some subregions. Ecosystem state exhibited strong spatial heterogeneity, with sustained high health in the eastern Longquan Mountain area and substantial improvement around Xinglong Lake, while northern urbanized and southern agricultural subregions lagged behind. Environmental governance responses strengthened, with the response index increasing from 0.2297 to 0.9885. Overall ecosystem health demonstrated a modest but stable improvement from 2004 to 2024, with 65.48% of the area revealing slight improvement, 1.14% experiencing substantial improvement, 29.62% remaining stable, and 3.76% experiencing slight degradation. Finally, restoration priority zones were delineated, and targeted strategies were introduced to inform basin-scale ecological management in the Luxi River Basin.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Chen & Guochao Li & Yixin Hao, 2026. "Landscape Pattern Evolution–Informed Ecosystem Health Assessment and Restoration Strategies in the Luxi River Basin (Chengdu, China) Based on the PSR Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-34, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:372-:d:1872219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/3/372/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/3/372/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:372-:d:1872219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.