Author
Listed:
- Yi Xia
(College of Resources and Environment, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
Yunnan Soil Fertilization and Pollution Remediation Engineering Research Center, Kunming 650201, China)
- Li Bao
(College of Resources and Environment, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
Yunnan Soil Fertilization and Pollution Remediation Engineering Research Center, Kunming 650201, China)
- Yunsheng Xia
(College of Resources and Environment, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
Yunnan Soil Fertilization and Pollution Remediation Engineering Research Center, Kunming 650201, China)
- Guangjie Liu
(College of Resources and Environment, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
Yunnan Soil Fertilization and Pollution Remediation Engineering Research Center, Kunming 650201, China)
Abstract
Reliable cropland mapping in Karst landscapes is hindered by high topographic heterogeneity and landscape fragmentation. Focusing on the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau in Southwest China, this study evaluates the accuracy and spatial consistency of seven global land cover products (i.e., GlobeLand30, CLCD, GLC_FCS30, CACD, ESA WorldCover, Esri Land Cover, and FROM-GLC10) against the Third National Land Survey released by China’s Ministry of Natural Resources. Furthermore, we employed Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) to diagnose key impact factors. The results reveal that the 10 m ESA WorldCover offers superior reliability (OA = 0.81, R 2 = 0.84), whereas GLC_FCS30 exhibits the weakest performance among the evaluated datasets (OA = 0.72, R 2 = 0.29), highlighting significant uncertainty in this complex terrain. Crucially, MGWR diagnostics (adjusted R 2 = 0.923 ) uncover how mapping uncertainty is driven by spatially non-stationary environmental constraints. Landscape fragmentation was identified as the primary global driver, exhibiting a consistent negative correlation with accuracy and indicating that the mixed pixel dilemma is the pervasive error source. In contrast, topographic slope operated as a dominant local constraint, with its inhibitory effect intensifying specifically in high-relief gorges where terrain shadowing compromises optical signals. Based on these mechanism diagnostics, we propose a region-adaptive decision framework integrating multi-source fusion and temporal logic to specifically target these topography- and fragmentation-induced uncertainties in future mapping.
Suggested Citation
Yi Xia & Li Bao & Yunsheng Xia & Guangjie Liu, 2026.
"The Accuracy, Spatial Consistency, and Impact Factors of Global Cropland Products in Karst Landscapes: A Case Study of the Yunnan–Guizhou Plateau,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:343-:d:1867959
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:343-:d:1867959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.