IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i2p330-d1865584.html

Multiple Scenario-Based Impacts of Urban Expansion on Ecosystem Health in the Three Major Urban Agglomerations of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahui Wu

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Wanqi Zhang

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Yelin Peng

    (Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Liang Zheng

    (School of Economics and Management, Jingchu University of Technology, Jingmen 448000, China
    Changjiang Survey, Planning, Design and Research Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430014, China
    China Agricultural Valley Development Research Center, Jingmen 448000, China)

  • Jianpeng Wang

    (Changjiang Survey, Planning, Design and Research Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430014, China)

  • Zhiling Liu

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

The rapid urban expansion (UE) in the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) in China has profoundly reshaped landscape patterns and ecosystem functions. Understanding the impact of UE on ecosystem health (EH) across different urban agglomerations is crucial for informing effective ecological governance and sustainability strategies. However, whether UE ultimately promotes or constrains EH across urban agglomerations under multi-scenario remains unclear. This study aims to address this gap by employing the Patch-generating Land Use Simulation model and the Vigor–Organization–Resilience–Service framework to simulate UE and EH in three major urban agglomerations of the YREB, while also examining the mechanisms through which UE influences EH. The results revealed substantial UE under all scenarios, with the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations exhibiting the most pronounced growth. The EH index showed a downward trend, from 0.621 in 2010 to 0.613 in 2020. Bivariate spatial autocorrelation and spatial regression analyses revealed a significant negative correlation between UE and EH. The study identified land fragmentation and occupation due to UE as the primary factors contributing to the deterioration of EH. The findings indicated the necessity of strategic urban planning to mitigate potential ecosystem risks while promoting sustainable urban development. Furthermore, regional cooperation is critical for addressing transboundary ecological challenges and ensuring the long-term sustainability and resilience of the YREB ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahui Wu & Wanqi Zhang & Yelin Peng & Liang Zheng & Jianpeng Wang & Zhiling Liu, 2026. "Multiple Scenario-Based Impacts of Urban Expansion on Ecosystem Health in the Three Major Urban Agglomerations of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:330-:d:1865584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:330-:d:1865584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.