IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i2p319-d1864522.html

Informing Strategic Planning Under Uncertainty: Using Rao’s Q Index on Scenario Rankings to Assess Landscape Stability and Vulnerability

Author

Listed:
  • Raffaele Pelorosso

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Sergio Noce

    (CMCC Foundation—Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
    National Biodiversity Future Center (NBFC), 90133 Palermo, Italy)

  • Francesco Cappelli

    (Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forest systems (DIBAF), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Duccio Rocchini

    (BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Federica Gobattoni

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Ciro Apollonio

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Andrea Petroselli

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Fabio Recanatesi

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

  • Maria Nicolina Ripa

    (Department of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), Tuscia University, 01100 Viterbo, Italy)

Abstract

Scenario planning supports strategic decision-making under uncertainty by comparing multiple plausible futures. Impact indicators help to prioritize scenarios, while rank-based evaluations clearly communicate indicator relevance for participatory planning, policymaking, and resource allocation. Ensuring that rankings are both sensitive and robust is therefore essential. However, conventional statistical measures fail to fully capture ranking dynamics. They describe overall dispersion but cannot jointly assess the magnitude of rank shifts and the frequency with which items occupy specific ranks across scenarios. This study explores the novel application of Rao’s Quadratic Entropy (Rao’s Q) in scenario analysis to quantify ranking variability. A theoretical test demonstrates that Rao’s Q captures full variability in rankings and continuous values, suggesting it as a promising alternative to existing approaches. Rao’s Q is then applied to a climate change hotspot in Central Italy to evaluate changes in bio-energy landscape connectivity across forty-eight scenarios. Results reveal how land-use and climate changes affect landscape unit connectivity over time, identifying which are highly stable across scenarios or consistently critical, and thus highlighting planning priorities for mitigation, conservation, and sustainable urban development. Supported by openly available R code, this study demonstrates the relevance of Rao’s Q for participatory, scenario-based decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Raffaele Pelorosso & Sergio Noce & Francesco Cappelli & Duccio Rocchini & Federica Gobattoni & Ciro Apollonio & Andrea Petroselli & Fabio Recanatesi & Maria Nicolina Ripa, 2026. "Informing Strategic Planning Under Uncertainty: Using Rao’s Q Index on Scenario Rankings to Assess Landscape Stability and Vulnerability," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:319-:d:1864522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/319/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/319/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:319-:d:1864522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.