IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i2p306-d1862631.html

Remote Sensing for Vegetation Monitoring: Insights of a Cross-Platform Coherence Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo R. Oliveira

    (CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago 7, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
    Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche, della Terra e dell’Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy)

  • Tiago van der Worp da Silva

    (CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago 7, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Luísa M. Gomes Pereira

    (Águeda School of Technology and Management, University of Aveiro, R. Cmte. Pinho e Freitas 28, 3750-127 Águeda, Portugal)

  • Nuno Vaz

    (CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago 7, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Jan Jacob Keizer

    (GeoBioTec—Geobiosciências, Geoengenharia e Geotecnologias, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago 7, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Bruna R. F. Oliveira

    (CESAM—Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago 7, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

Remote sensing has revolutionized monitoring landscapes that are inaccessible or impractical to survey on the ground. Satellite platforms such as Sentinel-2 enable assessment of ecosystem changes over extensive areas with high temporal frequency, while Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) offer flexible, ultra-high-resolution observations ideal for site-specific analysis and sensitive environments. This study compares the performance of Sentinel-2 and Phantom 4 multispectral RTK data for monitoring vegetation dynamics in Mediterranean shrubland ecosystems, focusing on the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Both platforms produced broadly consistent patterns in seasonal and interannual vegetation dynamics. However, UAS outperformed satellite data in capturing fine-scale heterogeneity, regeneration patches, and subtle disturbance responses, particularly in sparsely vegetated or heterogeneous terrain where satellite metrics may be insensitive. The comparison of NDVI across platforms accounted for standardized processing, harmonization, radiometric and atmospheric correction, and spatial resolution differences. Results show platform selection can be optimized according to monitoring objectives: satellite data are well suited for long-term monitoring of landscape-level vegetation dynamics, as both platforms capture consistent patterns when evaluated at comparable, spatially aggregated scales, while UAS data provide critical detail for localized management, early stress detection, and restoration prioritization by resolving fine-scale features. A combined approach enhances ecosystem disturbance assessments and resource management by binding the strengths of both wide-area coverage and precise spatial detail.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo R. Oliveira & Tiago van der Worp da Silva & Luísa M. Gomes Pereira & Nuno Vaz & Jan Jacob Keizer & Bruna R. F. Oliveira, 2026. "Remote Sensing for Vegetation Monitoring: Insights of a Cross-Platform Coherence Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:306-:d:1862631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/306/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/306/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:306-:d:1862631. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.