Author
Listed:
- Lihao Meng
(School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)
- Bolun Zhang
(School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)
- Lei Cao
(School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)
Abstract
To address the challenge of disconnection between cultural and ecological values in Linear Cultural Heritage (LCH) conservation, this study examines the Jinzhong section of the Great Tea Road to develop a dual-dimensional framework for corridor identification and collaborative governance. The research establishes a dual-value evaluation system encompassing cultural and ecological dimensions, applied to grade 422 heritage sites. A potential corridor network is subsequently generated using the Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) model. The study innovatively integrates the Multiple Centrality Analysis (MCA) model, employing heritage site values as network weights to identify and classify two primary corridor types: “culture-dominant” and “ecology-dominant” corridors. Through spatial overlay analysis, a ‘culture–ecology composite corridor’ network is ultimately constructed. The results demonstrate that the cultural value network exhibits a “monocentric” clustering pattern, whilst the ecological value network displays a “multicentric, networked” configuration, revealing significant spatial disjunction between the two systems. This analysis enables the identification of three corridor typologies—culturally dominant, ecologically dominant, and composite corridors integrating both values—alongside the positioning of key connectivity hubs and network vulnerability points across distinct value zones. The proposed “dual-dimension Multiple Centrality Analysis analytical framework” transforms the abstract concept of cultural–ecological value coupling into a quantifiable spatial analysis pathway, thereby addressing existing research gaps. This framework provides refined decision-making support for both conservation practices and World Heritage nomination processes of the Jinzhong section of the Great Tea Road, whilst offering a replicable scientific methodology for conserving comparable linear heritage sites globally.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:293-:d:1861640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.