Author
Listed:
- Dehui Meng
(School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)
- Yuanxiang Wu
(School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)
- Mingfeng Zhang
(School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)
- Youcheng Pan
(School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)
- Tingting Li
(School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)
- Hao Zhang
(School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)
- Haochen Li
(School of Architecture and Design, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
Key Laboratory of National Territory Spatial Planning and Ecological Restoration in Cold Regions, Ministry of Natural Resources, Harbin 150001, China)
Abstract
Ecological security is fundamental to human survival and sustainable development. However, current assessment frameworks often lack regional adaptability. They also frequently overlook the security risks associated with landscape patterns. To address these gaps, this study establishes a “structure–process–function” framework that integrates potential ecological risks. Using Heilongjiang Province as a case study, we assessed the spatiotemporal evolution of its ecological security pattern. The results indicate that: (1) The average ecological security pattern index (ESPI) values for Heilongjiang in 2000, 2010, and 2020 were 0.6869, 0.6573, and 0.6752, respectively. This trend exhibits an initial decline followed by partial recovery, with unsafe areas distributed sporadically. (2) The spatial pattern remained relatively stable but showed significant regional heterogeneity. Yichun City achieved the highest security level, while insecure areas were primarily concentrated in Daqing City. (3) Regarding specific dimensions, habitat fragmentation (structural security) was prevalent in central agricultural and urban areas; soil erosion (process security) remained significant in the southeastern regions, despite overall stability; and ecosystem services (functional security) followed a “degradation–adjustment–recovery” trend from 2000 to 2020. This framework effectively achieves the coupled assessment of landscape patterns and ecological security, providing scientific support for regional ecological management.
Suggested Citation
Dehui Meng & Yuanxiang Wu & Mingfeng Zhang & Youcheng Pan & Tingting Li & Hao Zhang & Haochen Li, 2026.
"Assessing Ecological Security Pattern by Integrating Multiple Risks in the Structure–Process–Function Framework: A Case Study from Heilongjiang Province, China,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:259-:d:1856022
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:259-:d:1856022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.