Author
Listed:
- Dizi Liu
(College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
- Song Liu
(College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
- Zhaocheng Bai
(College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
- Peiyu Shen
(College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
- Yuxiang Dong
(College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Department of Landscape Architecture, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)
Abstract
Rapid urbanization and industrialization have significantly reshaped rural landscapes in metropolitan fringe areas, resulting in “hybridized” characteristics. This study establishes an analytical framework to systematically characterize hybrid rural landscapes, diagnose specific local issues, reveal their spatial differentiation patterns and driving mechanisms, and propose targeted governance strategies. Taking 124 rural units in Baoshan District, Shanghai as a case, multi-source data from the latest available years (2020–2023) were compiled as a cross-sectional snapshot, and a comprehensive indicator system integrating landscape pattern (P), social function (F), and spatial vitality (V) was developed. Utilizing multi-source geospatial data—including land-use maps, points of interest, and mobile signaling data—Gaussian Mixture Models were applied to classify typical hybrid landscape types. Spatial evolution processes and underlying driving forces were further interpreted through remote sensing imagery analysis, field investigations, and policy document reviews. Eleven distinctive hybrid rural landscape types (HTs) were characterized, forming a spatial gradient from urban to rural, encompassing “high-density urbanized” → “ecologically embedded” → “production–living integrated” → “traditional rural landscapes”. Additionally, five representative evolutionary patterns—“urban restructuring”, “ecological orientation”, “industrial-driven transition”, “transitional hybridization”, and “traditional preservation”—were identified, shaped by spatial configuration, planning policies, industrial investments, and demographic dynamics. The framework enhances understanding of the complexity and evolutionary dynamics of rural landscapes, providing theoretical insights and practical guidance for effective typological governance and targeted policy interventions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:256-:d:1855548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.