IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i2p236-d1852555.html

Effects of Social Capital on Land Disputes and Regulation Through Administrative Intervention: Case Study Based on Yangtze River Economic Panel Data, 2010 to 2021

Author

Listed:
  • Shukui Tan

    (Department of Land Management, College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Mingyue Gong

    (Department of Land Management, College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Land disputes can pose significant threats to the life and property of residents, and integrated resolutions of land disputes can create opportunities for refining and adjusting land resources and rights. Over time, research on the determinants of land disputes has evolved from focusing on legal, administrative, and economic factors to exploring deeper social factors, particularly social capital. Drawing on data from China Judgement Online, Chinese social surveys, and various statistical yearbooks, this study uses an econometric model to innovatively assess three types social capital (social networks, interpersonal trust, and institutional trust) as key determinants of land disputes. The findings reveal that both structural social capital (represented by social networks) and cognitive social capital (in the form of institutional trust) can significantly reduce land disputes. Furthermore, administrative intervention may have a mediating effect by mitigating the negative influence of structural social capital on land disputes. The findings of this study not only advance the theoretical understanding of the influence of social capital on land disputes but also offer practical insights into preventing and resolving such disputes, thereby contributing to the establishment of a peaceful and secure society.

Suggested Citation

  • Shukui Tan & Mingyue Gong, 2026. "Effects of Social Capital on Land Disputes and Regulation Through Administrative Intervention: Case Study Based on Yangtze River Economic Panel Data, 2010 to 2021," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:236-:d:1852555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:236-:d:1852555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.