IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2026i2p207-d1848124.html

Is More Green Space Always Better for Healthy Aging? Exploring Spatial Threshold and Mediation Effects in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Yang

    (School of Arts and Innovation Design, Suzhou City University, Suzhou 215000, China)

  • Pengcheng Li

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215000, China)

  • Jiayi Li

    (Department of Urban Planning and Design, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215000, China
    School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZT, UK)

  • Jinliu Chen

    (School of Arts and Innovation Design, Suzhou City University, Suzhou 215000, China)

Abstract

Green space equity is increasingly recognized as a critical environmental condition for healthy aging, yet existing research often overlooks how different green space attributes—accessibility and diversity—are associated with distinct dimensions of older adults’ health. Limited attention has been paid to their nonlinear threshold effects or to the social pathways through which green spaces influence health outcomes. Using the United States county-level panel data from 2020 to 2023, this study integrates fixed-effects models, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and mediation analysis to examine the associations between green accessibility measured by the Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (2SFCA) method, and green diversity measured by the Shannon Index, on the general, physical, and mental health of older adults. Findings indicate that (1) higher green accessibility is associated with better general health, whereas green diversity shows a stronger association with physical health, reflecting its link to more heterogeneous ecosystem service environments. (2) Green accessibility demonstrates the threshold effect, in which the strength of association with health becomes steeper once accessibility approaches higher levels. (3) Green space equity is linked to health partly through social structures. Education clustering and marital stability mediate the associations with general health, while mental health appears to depend more on the social interaction opportunities embedded within green environments than on their physical attributes alone. The study proposes an integrated “physical environment–social structure–health outcome” framework and a threshold-oriented spatial intervention strategy, highlighting the need to prioritize improvements in green accessibility in underserved areas and prioritizing green diversity and age-friendly social functions where accessibility is already high. These findings offer evidence for designing inclusive, health-oriented urban environments for aging populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Yang & Pengcheng Li & Jiayi Li & Jinliu Chen, 2026. "Is More Green Space Always Better for Healthy Aging? Exploring Spatial Threshold and Mediation Effects in the United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:207-:d:1848124
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/2/207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2026:i:2:p:207-:d:1848124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.