IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v15y2025i1p44-d1826569.html

Sustainability Assessment of Circular Technologies in Agriculture: Overview of Evaluation Methodologies and Research Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Datola

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, Via Bonardi 3, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Alessandra Oppio

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Studies (DAStU), Politecnico di Milano, Via Bonardi 3, 20133 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Global demand for food is expected to grow significantly by 2050, underlying the urgency of a sustainable transition in agriculture. In this context, the Circular Economy (CE) paradigm emerges as a promising strategy. This transition is still ongoing, underscoring the importance of sustainability assessment as the first crucial step in supporting this process effectively. Therefore, comprehensive and robust evaluation tools and methodologies are necessary to support effective decision-making processes in this context. This study addresses this topic by conducting a literature review focused on the main evaluation methodologies adopted to assess the sustainability of circular technologies in agriculture, as well as to identify emerging research trends and to identify current knowledge gaps. Therefore, the main objective of this research is to establish a well-defined framework that starting from existing researches, it will support the development of future research directions. The performed review identifies Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as the most applied methodology for environmental impact assessment, due to its ability to analyze environmental impacts and resources consumption throughout the entire life-cycle of a product, followed by Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) and performances-based models for their capacity of integrating and managing many dimensions (environmental, economic, and social) within the evaluation process. Emerging trends highlight the increasing adoption of computational approaches, such as System Dynamics (SD), facilitating a more comprehensive assessment of complex agricultural systems. Despite this increasing attention, the review addresses the significant gap, or rather, the limited management of stakeholders’ conflicts and synergies. This gap will inform potential research directions within the Agritech project, especially regarding the development of Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE) to integrate stakeholders’ perspectives in the sustainability assessment of circular technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Datola & Alessandra Oppio, 2025. "Sustainability Assessment of Circular Technologies in Agriculture: Overview of Evaluation Methodologies and Research Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:44-:d:1826569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/1/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/15/1/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:44-:d:1826569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.