IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1906-d1752502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Governance of Centralized Farmers’ Residence Policy in Rural-Urban Integration: A Case Study of Shanghai L Town

Author

Listed:
  • Xinran Xu

    (School of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Wai Huan Xi Road No. 230, Guangzhou 510006, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work (co-first author).)

  • Qiong Li

    (School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Mei Long Road No. 130, Shanghai 200237, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work (co-first author).)

  • Zhiyan Liao

    (School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Mei Long Road No. 130, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Xi Yu

    (School of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Wai Huan Xi Road No. 230, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Amid China’s rural–urban integration and rural revitalization, the Centralized Residence of Farmers Policy (CRFP) emerges as a pivotal tool to optimize rural spatial structure and land-use efficiency, yet its implementation risks—particularly risk coupling effects—remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by constructing a holistic risk assessment framework and empirically examining CRFP in L Town, Shanghai; it employs a multi-method approach, integrating the Delphi method, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Cumulative Impact Model (CIM) to develop and validate a comprehensive risk assessment framework. This framework evaluates five key dimensions: policy content, implementation subjects, resource guarantees, target groups, and environmental adaptation. Empirical analysis of relocated farming households in L town reveals that the overall risk level of CRFP implementation falls within the moderate-risk range. Key identified risk factors identified include public opinion control, clarity of implementation standards, communication feedback accessibility, reliability of information resources, and effectiveness of implementation strategies. Based on these findings, the study proposes several risk mitigation strategies: aligning policies with local realities to promote high-quality social development, fostering collaborative digital governance through multi-stakeholder engagement, ensuring law-based policy formulation with transparent and supervised processes, enhancing public input through effective interest communication mechanisms, improving information dissemination with inclusive public participation, and adopting flexible implementation strategies. This research addresses fragmentation issues in the existing literature with a unified indicator system and provides actionable solutions that offer significant theoretical and practical value for advancing rural revitalization in the context of urban–rural integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinran Xu & Qiong Li & Zhiyan Liao & Xi Yu, 2025. "Risk Governance of Centralized Farmers’ Residence Policy in Rural-Urban Integration: A Case Study of Shanghai L Town," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1906-:d:1752502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fang Zhou & Xinran Guo & Chengye Liu & Qiaoyun Ma & Sandang Guo, 2023. "Analysis on the Influencing Factors of Rural Infrastructure in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Jiang, Changjun & Li, Jintao & Liu, Jilai, 2022. "Does urbanization affect the gap between urban and rural areas? Evidence from China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    3. Luis Camarero & Jesús Oliva, 2019. "Thinking in rural gap: mobility and social inequalities," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-7, December.
    4. Ruitian Zhang & Ping Jiang & Xuesong Kong, 2024. "Reconstructing Rural Settlements Based on Investigation of Consolidation Potential: Mechanisms and Paths," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Xinhua Zhu, 2017. "Impact of the Household Registration System on Farmers’ Rural Housing Land Use Decisions in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Chenxi Li & Jingyao Wu & Zenglei Xi & Weiqiang Zhang, 2021. "Farmers’ Satisfaction with Land Expropriation System Reform: A Case Study in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Yongchao Zhang & André Torre & Marianne Ehrlich, 2021. "Governance Structure of Rural Homestead Transfer in China: Government and/or Market?," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Muzhe Pan & Yaofu Huang & Yawen Qin & Xun Li & Wei Lang, 2022. "Problems and Strategies of Allocating Public Service Resources in Rural Areas in the Context of County Urbanization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Benjamin, Dwayne & Brandt, Loren & Giles, John, 2005. "The Evolution of Income Inequality in Rural China," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(4), pages 769-824, July.
    10. Yaqiong Duan & Su Chen & Lingda Zhang & Dan Wang & Dongyang Liu & Quanhua Hou, 2023. "Spatial Distribution Characteristic and Type Classification of Rural Settlements: A Case Study of Weibei Plain, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Mengting Liu & Yueqing Ji, 2020. "Determinants of Agricultural Infrastructure Construction in China: Based on the “Participation of Beneficiary Groups” Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    12. Yaohui Zhao, 1999. "Leaving the Countryside: Rural-to-Urban Migration Decisions in China," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(2), pages 281-286, May.
    13. Qiang He & Xin Deng & Chuan Li & Fangxia Kong & Yanbin Qi, 2021. "Does Land Transfer Improve Farmers’ Quality of Life? Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Rui Jin & Chunyuan Huang & Pei Wang & Junyong Ma & Yiliang Wan, 2023. "Identification of Inefficient Urban Land for Urban Regeneration Considering Land Use Differentiation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    15. Chen, Kunqiu & Long, Hualou & Liao, Liuwen & Tu, Shuangshuang & Li, Tingting, 2020. "Land use transitions and urban-rural integrated development: Theoretical framework and China’s evidence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Sun & Jie Chen & Jie Guo, 2025. "Multi-Source Data-Driven Identification and Spatial Optimization of Rural Settlements: Evidence from Sangxu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing & Xia, Fang & Huang, Jikun, 2014. "Moving Off the Farm: Land Institutions to Facilitate Structural Transformation and Agricultural Productivity Growth in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 505-520.
    3. Qu, Zhaopeng & Zhao, Zhong, 2017. "Glass ceiling effect in urban China: Wage inequality of rural-urban migrants during 2002–2007," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 118-144.
    4. Caiyao Xu & Chen Qian & Wencai Yang & Bowei Li & Lingqian Kong & Fanbin Kong, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Pattern of Urban-Rural Integration Development and Its Driving Mechanism Analysis in Hangzhou Bay Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Pedroni, Peter & Yao, James Yudong, 2006. "Regional income divergence in China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 294-315, April.
    6. Haiting Jiang & Bo Burström & Jiaying Chen & Kristina Burström, 2021. "Rural–Urban Inequalities in Poor Self-Rated Health, Self-Reported Functional Disabilities, and Depression among Chinese Older Adults: Evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2022. "Residents’ Selection Behavior of Compensation Schemes for Construction Land Reduction: Empirical Evidence from Questionnaires in Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Irune Ruiz-Martínez & Javier Esparcia, 2020. "Internet Access in Rural Areas: Brake or Stimulus as Post-Covid-19 Opportunity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Qu, Zhaopeng (Frank) & Zhao, Zhong, 2008. "Urban-Rural Consumption Inequality in China from 1988 to 2002: Evidence from Quantile Regression Decomposition," IZA Discussion Papers 3659, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Ellen Banzhaf & Sally Anderson & Gwendoline Grandin & Richard Hardiman & Anne Jensen & Laurence Jones & Julius Knopp & Gregor Levin & Duncan Russel & Wanben Wu & Jun Yang & Marianne Zandersen, 2022. "Urban-Rural Dependencies and Opportunities to Design Nature-Based Solutions for Resilience in Europe and China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-25, March.
    11. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Araar, Abdelkrim & Giles, John, 2010. "Chronic and transient poverty: Measurement and estimation, with evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 266-277, March.
    12. Piyush Tiwari & Tetsu Kawakami & Masayuki Doi, 2002. "Dual Labor Markets and Trade Reform in China," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 101-113.
    13. Chen, Yuanyuan & Wang, Haining & Cheng, Zhiming & Smyth, Russell, 2023. "Education and Migrant Health in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. Shichao Yuan & Xizhuo Wang, 2024. "Increase or Reduce: How Does Rural Infrastructure Investment Affect Villagers’ Income?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Wang, Bo & Li, Fan & Feng, Shuyi & Shen, Tong, 2020. "Transfer of development rights, farmland preservation, and economic growth: a case study of Chongqing’s land quotas trading program," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    16. Jiemin Liu & Xuejiao Su & Yuanmeng Liu & Wei Shui, 2024. "A Review of Research on Progress in the Theory and Practice of Eco-Product Value Realization," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Alan de Brauw & John Giles, 2017. "Migrant Opportunity and the Educational Attainment of Youth in Rural China," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 52(1), pages 272-311.
    18. Hertel, Thomas & Zhai, Fan, 2006. "Labor market distortions, rural-urban inequality and the opening of China's economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 76-109, January.
    19. Mullan, Katrina & Grosjean, Pauline & Kontoleon, Andreas, 2011. "Land Tenure Arrangements and Rural-Urban Migration in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 123-133, January.
    20. Sylvie Démurger & Haiyuan Wan, 2012. "Payments for ecological restoration and internal migration in China: the sloping land conversion program in Ningxia," IZA Journal of Migration and Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1906-:d:1752502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.