IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1906-d1752502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Governance of Centralized Farmers’ Residence Policy in Rural-Urban Integration: A Case Study of Shanghai L Town

Author

Listed:
  • Xinran Xu

    (School of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Wai Huan Xi Road No. 230, Guangzhou 510006, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work (co-first author).)

  • Qiong Li

    (School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Mei Long Road No. 130, Shanghai 200237, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work (co-first author).)

  • Zhiyan Liao

    (School of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Mei Long Road No. 130, Shanghai 200237, China)

  • Xi Yu

    (School of Public Administration, Guangzhou University, Wai Huan Xi Road No. 230, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Amid China’s rural–urban integration and rural revitalization, the Centralized Residence of Farmers Policy (CRFP) emerges as a pivotal tool to optimize rural spatial structure and land-use efficiency, yet its implementation risks—particularly risk coupling effects—remain underexplored. This study addresses this gap by constructing a holistic risk assessment framework and empirically examining CRFP in L Town, Shanghai; it employs a multi-method approach, integrating the Delphi method, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Cumulative Impact Model (CIM) to develop and validate a comprehensive risk assessment framework. This framework evaluates five key dimensions: policy content, implementation subjects, resource guarantees, target groups, and environmental adaptation. Empirical analysis of relocated farming households in L town reveals that the overall risk level of CRFP implementation falls within the moderate-risk range. Key identified risk factors identified include public opinion control, clarity of implementation standards, communication feedback accessibility, reliability of information resources, and effectiveness of implementation strategies. Based on these findings, the study proposes several risk mitigation strategies: aligning policies with local realities to promote high-quality social development, fostering collaborative digital governance through multi-stakeholder engagement, ensuring law-based policy formulation with transparent and supervised processes, enhancing public input through effective interest communication mechanisms, improving information dissemination with inclusive public participation, and adopting flexible implementation strategies. This research addresses fragmentation issues in the existing literature with a unified indicator system and provides actionable solutions that offer significant theoretical and practical value for advancing rural revitalization in the context of urban–rural integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinran Xu & Qiong Li & Zhiyan Liao & Xi Yu, 2025. "Risk Governance of Centralized Farmers’ Residence Policy in Rural-Urban Integration: A Case Study of Shanghai L Town," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1906-:d:1752502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1906-:d:1752502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.