IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1836-d1745113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rangeland Conditions and Grazing Capacities on Livestock Farms During and After Drought in Three Biomes in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ngoako L. Letsoalo

    (Agricultural Research Council–Animal Production, Private Bag X 2, Irene 0062, South Africa
    Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X 17, Bellville 7535, South Africa)

  • Igshaan M. Samuels

    (Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X 17, Bellville 7535, South Africa
    Agricultural Research Council–Animal Production, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X 17, Bellville 7535, South Africa)

  • Julius T. Tjelele

    (Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, University of South Africa, Private Bag X6, Florida 1709, South Africa)

  • Hosia T. Pule

    (Agricultural Research Council–Animal Production, Private Bag X 2, Irene 0062, South Africa)

  • Clement F. Cupido

    (Agricultural Research Council–Animal Production, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X 17, Bellville 7535, South Africa)

  • Adriaan Engelbrecht

    (Department of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X 17, Bellville 7535, South Africa)

Abstract

Climate change has intensified extreme weather events worldwide, such as droughts, which have severely affected South Africa’s rangelands by reducing productivity and increasing livestock mortality. This study aimed to investigate variability in grazing capacities and stocking rates with respect to land tenure, long-term grazing capacity norms, field surveys, and farmer perceptions during and post-drought conditions in the three biomes in South Africa. In-person interviews and field surveys were conducted with 85 farmers from the Grassland ( n = 25), Savanna ( n = 35), and Nama-Karoo ( n = 30) biomes and vegetation condition was surveyed during or after the drought. Grazing capacity did not differ significantly across land tenure systems in the Savanna biomes ( p > 0.05), but significant differences were found in the Grassland and Nama-Karoo biomes ( p < 0.05). Over > 60% of farmers in the Nama-Karoo biome rated their rangeland condition as poor because of the drought, and field surveys showed that grazing capacities were four times lower than the national recommended grazing capacity norm. Considering the high inter-annual variability in vegetation productivity and differences in farmers’ perceptions based on local knowledge, it is recommended that the Department of Agriculture adopt flexible grazing capacity ranges in the regulations of the Conservation of Agricultural Resource Act 43 of 1983.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngoako L. Letsoalo & Igshaan M. Samuels & Julius T. Tjelele & Hosia T. Pule & Clement F. Cupido & Adriaan Engelbrecht, 2025. "Rangeland Conditions and Grazing Capacities on Livestock Farms During and After Drought in Three Biomes in South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1836-:d:1745113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1836/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1836/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1836-:d:1745113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.