IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1791-d1741024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Simulation of Land Use Change and Assessment of Ecosystem Services Under Climate Change Scenarios: A Case Study of Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Li

    (College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Chengdong Wang

    (College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Mingxing Sun

    (Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Hui Zhang

    (College of Oceanography and Ecological Science, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Climate change and rapid urbanization exert significant impacts on ecosystem services (ESs). The rational assessment and prediction of ESs are crucial for urban sustainable development. This study analyzes the spatiotemporal changes in land use in Shanghai from 2000 to 2020 and evaluates the key ESs, including water yield, soil retention, carbon storage, and habitat quality. Furthermore, integrated “climate change-land use” scenarios were constructed to systematically simulate the response characteristics of ESs under different climate change and development pathways. The results indicate that Shanghai’s land use from 2000 to 2020 was characterized by continuous expansion of built-up land and a significant reduction in cropland. Ecological land exhibited a low and fragmented coverage. By 2040, the ecological protection (EP) scenario could effectively curb the disorderly expansion of built-up land and maintain the stability of cropland and woodland, whereas the natural development (ND) scenario would exacerbate urban sprawl towards the east and further fragment ecological land. From 2000 to 2020, water yield in Shanghai showed an increasing trend, soil retention initially decreased followed by a gradual recovery, carbon sequestration experienced minor fluctuations, and habitat quality exhibited a continuous decline. By 2040, the EP scenarios will effectively maintain water yield and soil retention functions, steadily enhance carbon sequestration and habitat quality, and mitigate the negative impacts of climate change. In contrast, the ND scenarios show an unstable trend of initial increase followed by decrease. Spatially, the western and northern regions consistently remain high-value ESs zones under both scenarios. In 2040, Shanghai’s ESs will exhibit distinct administrative district disparities, characterized by “peripheral sensitivity and central stability”. This pattern underscores the necessity for implementing zone-specific regulation strategies in future urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Li & Chengdong Wang & Mingxing Sun & Hui Zhang, 2025. "Dynamic Simulation of Land Use Change and Assessment of Ecosystem Services Under Climate Change Scenarios: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1791-:d:1741024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1791/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1791/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1791-:d:1741024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.