IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1751-d1737322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The CUGA Method: A Reliable Framework for Identifying Public Urban Green Spaces in Metropolitan Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Borja Ruiz-Apilánez

    (Escuela de Arquitectura, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain)

  • Francesco Pilla

    (School of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland)

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of reliably identifying Public Urban Green Spaces (PUGS) in metropolitan areas, a key requirement for advancing equitable access to green infrastructure and monitoring progress toward SDG 11.7 and WHO recommendations. In the absence of consistent local datasets, we propose the Candidate Urban Green Area (CUGA) method, which integrates OpenStreetMap and Copernicus Urban Atlas data through a structured, transparent workflow. The method applies spatial and functional filters to isolate green spaces that are publicly accessible, meet minimum size and usability criteria, and are embedded within the urban fabric. We validate CUGA in the Dublin Region using a stratified random sample of 1-ha cells and compare its performance against five alternative datasets. Results show that CUGA achieves the highest classification accuracy, spatial coverage, and statistical robustness across all counties, significantly outperforming administrative, crowdsourced, and satellite-derived sources. The method also delivers greater net spatial impact in terms of green area, catchment coverage, and residential land intercepted. These findings support the use of CUGA as a reliable and transferable tool for urban green space planning, policy evaluation, and sustainability reporting, particularly in data-scarce or fragmented governance contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Borja Ruiz-Apilánez & Francesco Pilla, 2025. "The CUGA Method: A Reliable Framework for Identifying Public Urban Green Spaces in Metropolitan Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-31, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1751-:d:1737322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1751/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1751/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1751-:d:1737322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.