IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i9p1716-d1731884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Performance Analysis of Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning Models for Multi-Satellite Fusion GNSS-IR Soil Moisture Retrieval

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Jiang

    (Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Rui Zhang

    (Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Hang Jiang

    (Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Bo Zhang

    (Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Kangyi Chen

    (Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Jichao Lv

    (Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 611756, China)

  • Jie Chen

    (Cryosphere Research Station on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Science and Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Yunfan Song

    (Institute of Plateau Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Chengdu 610072, China)

Abstract

Given the complexity of near-surface soil moisture retrieval, a single machine learning algorithm often struggles to capture the intricate relationships among multiple features, resulting in limited generalization and robustness. To address this issue, this study proposes a multi-satellite fusion GNSS-IR soil moisture retrieval method based on heterogeneous ensemble machine learning models. Specifically, two heterogeneous ensemble learning strategies (Bagging and Stacking) are combined with three base learners, Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), to construct eight ensemble GNSS-IR soil moisture retrieval models. The models are validated using data from GNSS stations P039, P041, and P043 within the Plate Boundary Observatory (PBO) network. Their retrieval performance is compared against that of individual machine learning models and a deep learning model (Multilayer Perceptron, MLP), enabling an optimized selection of algorithms and model architectures. Results show that the Stacking-based models significantly outperform those based on Bagging in terms of retrieval accuracy. Among them, the Stacking (BPNN-RF-SVM) model achieves the highest performance across all three stations, with R of 0.903, 0.904, and 0.917, respectively. These represent improvements of at least 2.2%, 2.8%, and 2.1% over the best-performing base models. Therefore, the Stacking (BPNN-RF-SVM) model is identified as the optimal retrieval model. This work aims to contribute to the development of high-accuracy, real-time monitoring methods for near-surface soil moisture.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Jiang & Rui Zhang & Hang Jiang & Bo Zhang & Kangyi Chen & Jichao Lv & Jie Chen & Yunfan Song, 2025. "Comparative Performance Analysis of Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning Models for Multi-Satellite Fusion GNSS-IR Soil Moisture Retrieval," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1716-:d:1731884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1716/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/9/1716/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:9:p:1716-:d:1731884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.