IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i8p1646-d1724793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Has the Belt and Road Initiative Enhanced Economic Resilience in Cities Along Its Route?

Author

Listed:
  • Tian Xia

    (Smart Governance and Policy, Inha University, Inharo 100, Nam-gu, Incheon 22221, Republic of Korea)

  • Siyu Li

    (Smart Governance and Policy, Inha University, Inharo 100, Nam-gu, Incheon 22221, Republic of Korea)

  • Yongrok Choi

    (Department of International Trade, Inha University, Inharo 100, Nam-gu, Incheon 22221, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Amid an increasingly complex and uncertain global landscape, geopolitical tensions and frequent trade frictions have emerged as critical external risks threatening the economic stability and sustainable development of Chinese cities. Enhancing cities’ economic resilience has become a key challenge in advancing China’s high-quality development agenda. As a major national strategic initiative, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is expected to offer new development opportunities and pathways for risk mitigation, particularly for cities situated along its domestic routes. This paper examines whether and how the BRI affects the economic resilience of these cities and further explores the moderating role of local governance capacity in policy implementation. To this end, an empirical strategy combining the entropy weighting method and the difference-in-differences (DID) approach is employed to systematically assess the impact of the BRI on urban economic resilience at the city level. The key findings are as follows: (1) The findings show that the BRI has an enhancing effect on the economic resilience of cities along the routes, but governance is very weak, and urban resilience improves by 0.0045 units on average. Our findings imply that, while the BRI appears to be on the correct path, enhanced governance is necessary to implement city-specific planning approaches effectively. (2) The results of the moderating effect indicate that local governance capacity significantly amplifies the impact of the BRI on urban economic resilience, underscoring the critical role of institutional strength in the policy transmission process. (3) The heterogeneity analysis reveals significant regional disparities in policy effectiveness: while the BRI significantly improves economic resilience in eastern and central cities, it exerts a suppressive effect in western regions. This divergence is closely associated with variations in local governance capacity. In contrast, cities with stronger governance capabilities are more likely to experience positive outcomes, as confirmed by the significant moderating effect of local governance capacity. This study contributes to the growing literature on the spatial implications of national development strategies by empirically examining how the BRI reshapes urban economic resilience across regions. It offers important policy insights for enhancing the spatial governance of cities, particularly in aligning strategic infrastructure investment with differentiated local capacities. The findings also provide a valuable reference for land-use planning and regional development policies aimed at building resilient urban systems under conditions of global uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian Xia & Siyu Li & Yongrok Choi, 2025. "Has the Belt and Road Initiative Enhanced Economic Resilience in Cities Along Its Route?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-31, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1646-:d:1724793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1646-:d:1724793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.