IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i8p1591-d1717424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping Tradeoffs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services as a Function of Forest Management

Author

Listed:
  • Hazhir Karimi

    (Department of Geography and the Environment, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA)

  • Christina L. Staudhammer

    (Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA)

  • Matthew D. Therrell

    (Department of Geography and the Environment, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA)

  • William J. Kleindl

    (Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA)

  • Leah M. Mungai

    (Department of Geography and the Environment, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA)

  • Amobichukwu C. Amanambu

    (Department of Geography and the Environment, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA)

  • C. Nathan Jones

    (Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA)

Abstract

The spatial variation of forest ecosystem services at regional scales remains poorly understood, and few studies have explicitly analyzed how ecosystem services are distributed across different forest management types. This study assessed the spatial overlap between forest management types and ecosystem service hotspots in the Southeastern United States (SEUS) and the Pacific Northwest (PNW) forests. We used the InVEST suite of tools and GIS to quantify carbon storage and water yield. Carbon storage was estimated, stratified by forest group and age class, and literature-based biomass pool values were applied. Average annual water yield and its temporal changes (2001–2020) were modeled using the annual water yield model, incorporating precipitation, potential evapotranspiration, vegetation type, and soil characteristics. Ecosystem service outputs were classified to identify hotspot zones (top 20%) and to evaluate the synergies and tradeoffs between these services. Hotspots were then overlaid with forest management maps to examine their distribution across management types. We found that only 2% of the SEUS and 11% of the PNW region were simultaneous hotspots for both services. In the SEUS, ecological and preservation forest management types showed higher efficiency in hotspot allocation, while in PNW, production forestry contributed relatively more to hotspot areas. These findings offer valuable insights for decision-makers and forest managers seeking to preserve the multiple benefits that forests provide at regional scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Hazhir Karimi & Christina L. Staudhammer & Matthew D. Therrell & William J. Kleindl & Leah M. Mungai & Amobichukwu C. Amanambu & C. Nathan Jones, 2025. "Mapping Tradeoffs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services as a Function of Forest Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1591-:d:1717424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1591/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1591/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1591-:d:1717424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.