IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i8p1523-d1708905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Invasive Species Influence Biotic and Abiotic Factors Drive Vegetation Success in Salt Marsh Ecosystems?

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Zhou

    (School of Marine Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Chunqi Qiu

    (School of Marine Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Hongyu Liu

    (School of Marine Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Yufeng Li

    (School of Marine Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Cheng Wang

    (College of Economics & Management, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

  • Gang Wang

    (School of Urban and Planning, Yancheng Teachers University, Yancheng 224007, China)

  • Mengyuan Su

    (School of Marine Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Chen He

    (School of Marine Science and Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

Vegetation succession is a critical indicator of ecosystem structure and function and is often disrupted by the expansion of invasive species. However, ecosystem-scale studies elucidating invasion-driven succession mechanisms remain limited. This research focused on the Yancheng coastal salt marsh and analyzed the distribution variation of invasive species ( Spartina alterniflora ) and native species ( Suaeda salsa and Phragmites australis ) from 1987 to 2022 via the Google Earth Engine and random forest method. Logistic/Gaussian models were used to quantify land–sea distribution changes and vegetation succession trajectories. By integrating data on soil salinity, invasion duration, and fractional vegetation cover, generalized additive models (GAMs) were applied to identify the main factors influencing vegetation succession and to explore how Spartina alterniflora invasion affects the succession of salt marsh vegetation. The results indicated that the areas of Spartina alterniflora and Phragmites australis significantly increased by 3787.49 ha and 3452.60 ha in 35 years, respectively, contrasting with Suaeda salsa ’s 82.46% decline. The FVC in the area has significantly increased by 42.10%, especially in the coexisted areas of different vegetation communities, indicating intensified interspecific competition. The overall trend of soil salinity was decreasing, with a decrease in soil salinity in native species areas from 0.72% to 0.37%. From the results of GAMs, soil salinity, tidal action, and invasion duration were significant factors influencing the distribution of native species, but salinity was not a significant factor affecting the Spartina alterniflora distribution. The findings revealed that the expansion of Spartina alterniflora changed the soil salinity and interspecific interactions, thereby altering the original plant community structure and establishing a new vegetation succession. This study enhances the understanding of the impacts of invasive species on ecosystems and offers theoretical support for salt marsh restoration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Zhou & Chunqi Qiu & Hongyu Liu & Yufeng Li & Cheng Wang & Gang Wang & Mengyuan Su & Chen He, 2025. "How Do Invasive Species Influence Biotic and Abiotic Factors Drive Vegetation Success in Salt Marsh Ecosystems?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1523-:d:1708905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1523/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/8/1523/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:8:p:1523-:d:1708905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.