IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1501-d1706128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Are Residents’ Livelihoods Affected by National Parks? A SEM Model Based on DFID Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Likun Gu

    (National Research Center for Resettlement, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Social Development, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Asian Research Center, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Guoqing Shi

    (National Research Center for Resettlement, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Social Development, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Asian Research Center, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Yuanke Zhao

    (National Research Center for Resettlement, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Social Development, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Asian Research Center, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Huicong Liu

    (National Research Center for Resettlement, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Social Development, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Asian Research Center, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xinyu Ye

    (National Research Center for Resettlement, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Institute of Social Development, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    Asian Research Center, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

National parks represent a global initiative for biodiversity conservation and environmentally sustainable societal development, with China having launched its own national park program. The establishment and operation of these parks significantly impact local residents’ livelihoods. Based on DFID’s Sustainable Livelihoods Framework, an assessment tool introduced by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for evaluating the livelihood standards of residents, this study constructs a structural equation modeling (SEM) framework to analyze how national parks affect residents’ livelihoods, discussing livelihood risk management and feasible capacity-building interventions. Focusing on the Northeast Tiger and Leopard National Park as a case study, the research reveals that indirect wildlife-inflicted damage poses more pronounced negative impacts on local communities than park establishment policies. Both regulatory land-use restrictions and wildlife conflicts disrupt land-based livelihood activities, ultimately affecting residents’ livelihood stability. Mitigation requires comprehensive measures, including retaining essential farmland; providing vocational skill training; offering specialized loans; diversifying employment channels; and improving compensation mechanisms to safeguard residents’ livelihood security.

Suggested Citation

  • Likun Gu & Guoqing Shi & Yuanke Zhao & Huicong Liu & Xinyu Ye, 2025. "How Are Residents’ Livelihoods Affected by National Parks? A SEM Model Based on DFID Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1501-:d:1706128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1501/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1501/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1501-:d:1706128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.