Author
Listed:
- Yue Gong
(School of Design and Art, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China)
- Shuang Song
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)
- Xuanhe Zhang
(School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China)
Abstract
Southwest China, with typical karst, is one of the 36 biodiversity hotspots in the world, facing extreme ecological fragility due to thin soils, limited water retention, and high bedrock exposure. This fragility intensifies under climate change and human pressures, threatening regional sustainable development. Ecological strategic areas (ESAs) are critical safeguards for ecosystem resilience, yet their spatiotemporal dynamics and driving mechanisms remain poorly quantified. To address this gap, this study constructed a multidimensional ecological health assessment framework (pattern integrity–process efficiency–function diversity). By integrating Sen’s slope, a correlated Mann–Kendall (CMK) test, the Hurst index, and fuzzy C-means clustering, we systematically evaluated ecological health trends and identified ESA differentiation patterns for 2000–2024. Orthogonal partial least squares structural equation modeling (OPLS-SEM) quantified driving factor intensities and pathways. The results revealed that ecological health improved overall but exhibited significant spatial disparity: persistently high in southern Guangdong and most of Yunnan, and persistently low in the Sichuan Basin and eastern Hubei, with 41.47% of counties showing declining/slightly declining trends. ESAs were concentrated in the southwest/southeast, whereas high-EHI ESAs increased while low-EHI ESAs declined. Additionally, the natural environmental and human interference impacts decreased, while unique geographic factors (notably the rock exposure rate, with persistently significant negative effects) increased. This long-term, multidimensional assessment provides a scientific foundation for targeted conservation and sustainable development strategies in fragile karst ecosystems.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1487-:d:1704273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.