IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1461-d1701229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermal Infrared UAV Applications for Spatially Explicit Wildlife Occupancy Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Eve Bohnett

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 89101, USA)

  • Babu Ram Lamichanne

    (National Trust for Nature Conservation, Chitwan 44204, Nepal
    Wildlife Conservation and Research Endeavour (WILD CARE) Nepal, Pulchowk, Lalitpur 44700, Nepal)

  • Surendra Chaudhary

    (National Trust for Nature Conservation, Chitwan 44204, Nepal)

  • Kapil Pokhrel

    (National Trust for Nature Conservation, Chitwan 44204, Nepal)

  • Giavanna Dorman

    (Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Axel Flores

    (Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Rebecca Lewison

    (Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Fang Qiu

    (Department of Geospatial Information Science, University of Texas, Dallas, TX 75080, USA)

  • Doug Stow

    (Department of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA)

  • Li An

    (The Complex Human-Environment Systems Lab, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)

Abstract

Assessing the impact of community-based conservation programs on wildlife biodiversity remains a significant challenge. This pilot study was designed to develop and demonstrate a scalable, spatially explicit workflow using thermal infrared (TIR) imagery and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for non-invasive biodiversity monitoring. Conducted in a 2-hectare grassland area in Chitwan, Nepal, the study applied TIR-based grid sampling and multi-species occupancy models with thin-plate splines to evaluate how species detection and richness might vary between (1) morning and evening UAV flights, and (2) the Chitwan National Park and Kumroj Community Forest. While the small sample area inherently limits ecological inference, the aim was to test and demonstrate data collection and modeling protocols that could be scaled to larger landscapes with sufficient replication, and not to produce generalizable ecological findings from a small dataset. The pilot study results revealed higher species detection during morning flights, which allowed us to refine our data collection. Additionally, models accounting for spatial autocorrelation using thin plate splines suggested that community-based conservation programs effectively balanced ecosystem service extraction with biodiversity conservation, maintaining richness levels comparable to the national park. Models without splines indicated significantly higher species richness within the national park. This study demonstrates the potential for spatially explicit methods for monitoring grassland mammals using TIR UAV as indicators of anthropogenic impacts and conservation effectiveness. Further data collection over larger spatial and temporal scales is essential to capture the occupancy more generally for species with larger home ranges, as well as any effects of rainfall, flooding, and seasonal variability on biodiversity in alluvial grasslands.

Suggested Citation

  • Eve Bohnett & Babu Ram Lamichanne & Surendra Chaudhary & Kapil Pokhrel & Giavanna Dorman & Axel Flores & Rebecca Lewison & Fang Qiu & Doug Stow & Li An, 2025. "Thermal Infrared UAV Applications for Spatially Explicit Wildlife Occupancy Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1461-:d:1701229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1461/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1461/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Crainiceanu, Ciprian M. & Ruppert, David & Wand, Matthew P., 2005. "Bayesian Analysis for Penalized Spline Regression Using WinBUGS," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 14(i14).
    2. Crainiceanu, Ciprian M. & Goldsmith, A. Jeffrey, 2010. "Bayesian Functional Data Analysis Using WinBUGS," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 32(i11).
    3. Fan Yang & Quanqin Shao & Zhigang Jiang, 2019. "A Population Census of Large Herbivores Based on UAV and Its Effects on Grazing Pressure in the Yellow-River-Source National Park, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Lazaro J. Mangewa & Patrick A. Ndakidemi & Linus K. Munishi, 2019. "Integrating UAV Technology in an Ecological Monitoring System for Community Wildlife Management Areas in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eve Bohnett & Jessica Schulz & Robert Dobbs & Thomas Hoctor & Dave Hulse & Bilal Ahmad & Wajid Rashid & Hardin Waddle, 2023. "Shorebird Monitoring Using Spatially Explicit Occupancy and Abundance," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Alexandre Rodrigues & Peter Diggle & Renato Assuncao, 2010. "Semiparametric approach to point source modelling in epidemiology and criminology," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(3), pages 533-542, May.
    3. Erin E. Gabriel & Michael J. Daniels & M. Elizabeth Halloran, 2016. "Comparing biomarkers as trial level general surrogates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1046-1054, December.
    4. Welham, S.J. & Thompson, R., 2009. "A note on bimodality in the log-likelihood function for penalized spline mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 920-931, February.
    5. Esra Kürüm & Danh V. Nguyen & Qi Qian & Sudipto Banerjee & Connie M. Rhee & Damla Şentürk, 2024. "Spatiotemporal multilevel joint modeling of longitudinal and survival outcomes in end-stage kidney disease," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 827-852, October.
    6. Li, Kan & Luo, Sheng, 2019. "Bayesian functional joint models for multivariate longitudinal and time-to-event data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 14-29.
    7. Weining Shen & Subhashis Ghosal, 2015. "Adaptive Bayesian Procedures Using Random Series Priors," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(4), pages 1194-1213, December.
    8. Stephen N. Freeman & Nicholas J. B. Isaac & Panagiotis Besbeas & Emily B. Dennis & Byron J. T. Morgan, 2021. "A Generic Method for Estimating and Smoothing Multispecies Biodiversity Indicators Using Intermittent Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(1), pages 71-89, March.
    9. Donald Margaret R. & Wilson Susan R., 2017. "Comparison and visualisation of agreement for paired lists of rankings," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 31-45, March.
    10. Aldo Gardini & Carlo Trivisano & Enrico Fabrizi, 2021. "Bayesian Analysis of ANOVA and Mixed Models on the Log-Transformed Response Variable," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 619-641, June.
    11. Botts, Carsten H. & Daniels, Michael J., 2008. "A flexible approach to Bayesian multiple curve fitting," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 5100-5120, August.
    12. Daewon Yang & Taeryon Choi & Eric Lavigne & Yeonseung Chung, 2022. "Non‐parametric Bayesian covariate‐dependent multivariate functional clustering: An application to time‐series data for multiple air pollutants," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1521-1542, November.
    13. Djeundje, Viani Biatat & Crook, Jonathan, 2019. "Identifying hidden patterns in credit risk survival data using Generalised Additive Models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(1), pages 366-376.
    14. Bellio, Ruggero & Grassetti, Luca, 2011. "Semiparametric stochastic frontier models for clustered data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 71-83, January.
    15. repec:jss:jstsof:37:i05 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Gabriel Riutort-Mayol & Virgilio Gómez-Rubio & José Luis Lerma & Julio M. del Hoyo-Meléndez, 2020. "Correlated Functional Models with Derivative Information for Modeling Microfading Spectrometry Data on Rock Art Paintings," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Qi Qian & Danh V. Nguyen & Esra Kürüm & Connie M. Rhee & Sudipto Banerjee & Yihao Li & Damla Şentürk, 2024. "Multivariate Varying Coefficient Spatiotemporal Model," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 16(3), pages 761-786, December.
    18. Julie Vercelloni & M Julian Caley & Mohsen Kayal & Samantha Low-Choy & Kerrie Mengersen, 2014. "Understanding Uncertainties in Non-Linear Population Trajectories: A Bayesian Semi-Parametric Hierarchical Approach to Large-Scale Surveys of Coral Cover," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-9, November.
    19. M�rcio Poletti Laurini, 2014. "Dynamic functional data analysis with non-parametric state space models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 142-163, January.
    20. O. Gimenez & C. Crainiceanu & C. Barbraud & S. Jenouvrier & B. J. T. Morgan, 2006. "Semiparametric Regression in Capture–Recapture Modeling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 691-698, September.
    21. Gutiérrez, Luis & Gutiérrez-Peña, Eduardo & Mena, Ramsés H., 2014. "Bayesian nonparametric classification for spectroscopy data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 56-68.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1461-:d:1701229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.