IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i7p1337-d1685341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Land Conservation to Famers’ Income Growth: How Advanced Livelihoods Moderate the Income-Increasing Effect of Land Resources in an Ecological Function Area

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Zhang

    (School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100071, China)

  • Yiqi Zhang

    (School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100071, China)

  • Yanjing Yang

    (School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100071, China)

  • Wenduo Wang

    (School of Labor Economics, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100071, China)

  • Xueting Zeng

    (Resource and Ecological Sustainability Management Center, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100071, China)

Abstract

Balancing ecological conservation and rural livelihoods in protected areas remains a global challenge, particularly under strict land use regulations and economic development constraints. Territorial spatial planning (TSP) in an ecological function area (EFA) faces constraints such as land use restrictions, ecological redlines, and economic development limits. This study investigates how ecological land resources influence farmers’ incomes in ecological function areas (EFAs), with a focus on the moderating role of advanced livelihoods (ALI). Using an integrated Fixed-Effects–SVM–Genetic Algorithm framework, we quantify nonlinear policy-livelihood interactions and simulate multi-scenario governmental interventions (e.g., ecological investment, returning farmland to forest/RFF) across Beijing’s EFA, which can obtain the key findings as follows: (a) Ecological land resources have a significant positive effect on farmers’ incomes due to production-manner adjustment guided by governmental green strategy and corresponding TSP in an ecological restoration area of an EFA, while they have a non-significant impact in the core ecological reserve areas on account of the strict environmental protection restrictions on economic activities. (b) Differences in financial support between lower and higher economic development zones can bring about adverse impact results on farmers’ incomes in an EFA. (c) ALI significantly amplifies the positive impact of ecological land use on farmers’ incomes, demonstrating its critical role in bridging ecological and economic goals. (d) Sensitivity analysis results under RFF, targeted government investment, and ALI can maximize income gains through policy interaction from the government and farmer sides jointly. The above obtained results are beneficial to balance ecological protection and economic interests of farmers’ sustainably in an EFA.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Zhang & Yiqi Zhang & Yanjing Yang & Wenduo Wang & Xueting Zeng, 2025. "From Land Conservation to Famers’ Income Growth: How Advanced Livelihoods Moderate the Income-Increasing Effect of Land Resources in an Ecological Function Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1337-:d:1685341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/7/1337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:1337-:d:1685341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.