Author
Listed:
- Ruoshi Zhang
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Xiaoqing Tang
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Lifang Wu
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Yuchen Wang
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Xiaojing He
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Mengjie Liu
(School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)
Abstract
Recent advancements in urban vitality space design reflect increasing academic attention to emotional experience dimensions, paralleled by the emergence of AI-based generative technology as a transformative tool for systematically exploring the emotional attachment potential in preliminary designs. To effectively utilize AI-generative design results for spatial vitality creation and evaluation, exploring whether generated spaces respond to people’s emotional demands is necessary. This study establishes a comparative framework analyzing emotional attachment characteristics between LoRA-generated spatial designs and the real urban vitality space, using the representative case of THE BOX in Chaoyang, Beijing. Empirical data were collected through structured on-site surveys with 115 validated participants, enabling a comprehensive emotional attachment evaluation. SPSS 26.0 was employed for multi-dimensional analyses, encompassing aggregate attachment intensity, dimensional differentiation, and correlation mapping. Key findings reveal that while both generative and original spatial representations elicit measurable positive responses, AI-generated designs demonstrate a limited capacity to replicate the authentic three-dimensional experiential qualities inherent to physical environments, particularly regarding structural articulation and material tactility. Furthermore, significant deficiencies persist in the generative design’s cultural semiotic expression and visual-interactive spatial legibility, resulting in diminished user satisfaction. The analysis reveals that LoRA-generated spatial solutions require strategic enhancements in dynamic visual hierarchy, interactive integration, chromatic optimization, and material fidelity to bridge this experiential gap. These insights suggest viable pathways for integrating generative AI methodologies with conventional urban design practices, potentially enabling more sophisticated hybrid approaches that synergize digital innovation with built environment realities to cultivate enriched multisensory spatial experiences.
Suggested Citation
Ruoshi Zhang & Xiaoqing Tang & Lifang Wu & Yuchen Wang & Xiaojing He & Mengjie Liu, 2025.
"Evaluation on AI-Generative Emotional Design Approach for Urban Vitality Spaces: A LoRA-Driven Framework and Empirical Research,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1300-:d:1681888
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1300-:d:1681888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.