Author
Listed:
- Ping Xu
(School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 Fochengxi Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211100, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Han Mu
(School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 Fochengxi Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211100, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Jingwei Shao
(School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 Fochengxi Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211100, China)
- Yuan Yuan
(School of Public Administration, Hohai University, 8 Fochengxi Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211100, China)
Abstract
Under the context of urban–rural integration, exploring the complex process and general patterns of rural transformation is a critical issue for advancing sustainable rural development. This study develops a theoretical framework for rural transformation from the perspective of the rural–urban continuum. By analyzing the shifting urban–rural dominance relationships across different periods in township units, we extracted the main paths of rural transformation. Empirical analysis of 46 townships in Suzhou, China from 1990 to 2020 reveals the following key findings: (1) The urban–rural dominance relationships in township units have undergone an evolution from “differentiation to intensification to stabilization” over the past three decades, shaped by two pivotal moments—the Sunan Model and the New Sunan Model. (2) By combining four modes (enhancement, weakening, stabilization, and exchange) across different time periods, three primary paths of rural transformation in Suzhou emerge: a continuous stabilization type, a mid-late enhancement type, and a mid-term weakening type. (3) The spatial heterogeneity of the driving mechanisms is particularly evident in the northern region’s modernization of agriculture, the southern region’s characteristic fisheries, the western region’s localized urbanization, and the eastern region’s integration of industry, city, and population (I-C-P). The diverse paths identified in this study offer a deeper understanding of the simplified macro trend in which rurality weakens and urbanity strengthens, providing valuable insights for the tailored promotion of rural revitalization.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1145-:d:1663687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.