IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p915-d1640298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Earthquake-Triggered Ecosystem Carbon Loss Using Field Sampling and UAV Observation

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Zeng

    (Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University-The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Baofeng Di

    (Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University-The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chengdu 610065, China
    Center for Archaeological Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Yu Zhan

    (College of Carbon Neutrality Future Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Wen He

    (Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University-The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Junhui Li

    (Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University-The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Ziquan Zuo

    (Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Sichuan University-The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Siwen Yu

    (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Tan Mi

    (College of Carbon Neutrality Future Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

Earthquakes disrupt local organic carbon distribution by stripping vegetation, destabilizing soil, and triggering landslides, leading to immediate carbon loss and potential long-term climate impacts. While remote sensing techniques effectively assess post-earthquake vegetation loss, they fail to capture subsurface carbon dynamics along vertical profiles. This study quantifies ecosystem carbon loss from the Luding Earthquake by integrating field sampling, UAV-based LiDAR, and machine learning models to assess vegetation and soil carbon stocks. Field investigations were conducted at landslide deposits, debris flow deposits, and undisturbed sites to analyze soil organic carbon and biomass carbon content. UAV-derived point cloud data improved vegetation biomass estimation, reducing sample plot overestimation by 30.4% due to uneven vegetation distribution. The results indicate that landslides and debris flows caused an 83.9–95.9% reduction in carbon storage, with the total ecosystem carbon loss estimated at 7.36 × 10 5 Mg. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of earthquake-triggered carbon loss, offering critical insights for carbon budget research on natural disasters and the development of post-earthquake ecological restoration policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Zeng & Baofeng Di & Yu Zhan & Wen He & Junhui Li & Ziquan Zuo & Siwen Yu & Tan Mi, 2025. "Assessing Earthquake-Triggered Ecosystem Carbon Loss Using Field Sampling and UAV Observation," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:915-:d:1640298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/915/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/915/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:915-:d:1640298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.